Larry Clay v. Chris Brewer
Petitioner / Appellant: Larry Clay
Respondent / Appellee: Chris Brewer, Superintendent
Case Number: 23-1061
Filed: January 12, 2023
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on February 16, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
February 16, 2023 RECORD FILED - EXHIBITS, Comments: 1 folder containing State's Exhibit #1 (CD) [Original - Return to the District Court at end of case], Source Location: USDC / WMKC [5246651] [23-1061] (STL) [Entered: 02/16/2023 10:56 AM]
February 7, 2023 CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE filed by Attorney Ms. Jennifer Hernandez for Appellant Larry Clay correcting [ # 5242721-2 ] Application filed by Appellant. [5243265] [23-1061] (JH) [Entered: 02/07/2023 12:39 PM]
February 7, 2023 MOTION Leave to File Overlength Certificate of Appealability, filed by Attorney Ms. Jennifer Hernandez for Appellant Larry Clay w/service 02/07/2023. [5243225] [23-1061] (JH) [Entered: 02/07/2023 11:36 AM]
February 6, 2023 APPLICATION for Certificate of Appealability, filed by Appellant Larry Clay w/service 02/06/2023 [5242721] [23-1061] (JH) [Entered: 02/06/2023 02:44 PM]
February 6, 2023 On December 1, 2016, the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure were amended to require a certificate of compliance for motions/petitions filed under [Rule 27/Rule 5/Rule 21/Rule 35/Rule 40], certifying that the document complies with the type-volume limitations and stating the number of words in the document. Your recently filed motion/petition did not contain this certificate of compliance. No action will be taken on your Application for certificate of appealability, [ # 5242721-2 ], submitted by Larry Clay in 23-1061 , pending the filing of a certificate of compliance using the 'Certificate of Compliance' event. Please do not refile your motion. [23-1061] (CJO) [Entered: 02/06/2023 05:10 PM]
February 6, 2023 **LOCKED**CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE filed by Attorney Ms. Jennifer Hernandez for Appellant Larry Clay correcting [ # 5242721-2 ] Application for certificate of appealability filed by Appellant. [5242970] Corrected Certificate of Compliance filed 02/07/2023. [23-1061]--[Edited 02/10/2023 by CJO] (JH) [Entered: 02/06/2023 05:51 PM]
January 13, 2023 CLERK ORDER:Granting [ # 5235398-2 ] motion for extension of time to file application for COA filed by Mr. Kent E. Gipson and Ms. Jennifer Hernandez. Deadline to file application 02/13/2023. [5235557] [23-1061] (CJO) [Entered: 01/13/2023 09:35 AM]
January 13, 2023 UPDATED fee status - [Case Number 23-1061: pending] [5235550] [23-1061] (CJO) [Entered: 01/13/2023 09:20 AM]
January 12, 2023 CLERK ORDER:The $505 appellate filing and docketing fee has not been paid and is due. Appellant is directed to either pay the fee in the district court or file a motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis in this court within 28 days of the date of this order. If appellant does not pay the fee or move for IFP status by 02/09/2023, this appeal may be dismissed for failure to prosecute without further notice. [5235235] [23-1061] (CJO) [Entered: 01/12/2023 10:53 AM]
January 12, 2023 Originating court document filed consisting of notice of appeal, docket entries, Order Denying Petition 12/12/2022, Judgment 12/12/2022, and Order 01/11/2023. [5235234] [23-1061] (CJO) [Entered: 01/12/2023 10:51 AM]
January 12, 2023 CLERK ORDER:If the original file of the United States District Court is available for review in electronic format, the court will rely on the electronic version of the record in its review. The appendices required by Eighth Circuit Rule 30A shall not be required. In accordance with Eighth Circuit Local Rule 30A(a)(2), the Clerk of the United States District Court is requested to forward to this Court forthwith any portions of the original record which are not available in an electronic format through PACER, including any documents maintained in paper format or filed under seal, exhibits, administrative records and state court files. These documents should be submitted within 10 days. [5235236] [23-1061] (CJO) [Entered: 01/12/2023 10:54 AM]
January 12, 2023 MOTION for leave to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis w/attached affidavit, filed by Ms. Jennifer Hernandez for Appellant Larry Clay and Mr. Kent E. Gipson for Appellant Larry Clay w/service 01/12/2023. [5235397] [23-1061]--[Edited 01/13/2023 by CJO to seal the Attached "In Forma Pauperis Affidavit" ] (JH) [Entered: 01/12/2023 02:44 PM]
January 12, 2023 MOTION for extension of time to file COA until 02/13/2023, filed by Ms. Jennifer Hernandez for Appellant Larry Clay and Mr. Kent E. Gipson for Appellant Larry Clay w/service 01/12/2023. [5235398] [23-1061] (JH) [Entered: 01/12/2023 02:47 PM]
January 12, 2023 Prisoner case docketed. [5235226] [23-1061] (CJO) [Entered: 01/12/2023 10:35 AM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Larry Clay v. Chris Brewer
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner / appellant: Larry Clay
Represented By: Kent E. Gipson
Represented By: Jennifer Hernandez
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent / appellee: Chris Brewer, Superintendent
Represented By: Andrew James Clarke
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?