Shaun Rose v. Callaway County Jail & Sheriff's Dept, et al
| Shaun A. Rose |
| Callaway County Jail and Sheriff's Department, Lucas Stassel, Sergeant, Callaway County Jail and Travis Burton, Corrections Officer, Callaway County Jail |
| 23-1187 |
| January 31, 2023 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit |
| Prison Condition |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 31, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| DOCUMENT FILED - affidavit for request of prison account statement from facility filed by Mr. Shaun A. Rose w/service 03/31/2023. [5260707] [23-1187] (CMH) [Entered: 03/31/2023 01:01 PM] |
| MOTION for appointment of counsel, filed by Appellant Mr. Shaun A. Rose w/service 03/31/2023. [5260698] [23-1187] (CMH) [Entered: 03/31/2023 12:52 PM] |
| LETTER from Appellant Mr. Shaun A. Rose inquiring as to the status of the case, w/service 03/22/2023. Docket sheet mailed to appellant this date. [5257613] [23-1187] (CJO) [Entered: 03/22/2023 12:35 PM] |
| CLERK ORDER: The court is in receipt of your motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis or set up a payment plan on appeal. A motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis must include an Application to Proceed Without Prepaying Fees or Costs or an affidavit that shows in the same detail of your inability to pay or to give security for fees and costs. As a courtesy, we have enclosed a copy of the Application to Proceed Without Prepaying Fees or Costs. Please complete and return the form, or submit an affidavit that establishes in the same detail your inability to pay, no later than April 14 2023. [5256462] [23-1187] (CMH) [Entered: 03/17/2023 04:45 PM] |
| MOTION for leave to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis with a payment plan, filed by Appellant Mr. Shaun A. Rose w/service 03/17/2023. [5256456] [23-1187] (CMH) [Entered: 03/17/2023 04:39 PM] |
| CLERK ORDER: APPELLANT has failed to pay to the Clerk of the District Court the requisite docketing fees. APPELLANT is directed to show cause within 14 days why this appeal should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute. Response of Shaun A. Rose due 03/21/2023. [5252460] [23-1187] (CMH) [Entered: 03/07/2023 12:22 PM] |
| Originating court document filed consisting of notice of appeal, docket entries, Order and Judgment 1/3/2023 and Order 1/31/2023. [5241002] [23-1187] (CMH) [Entered: 01/31/2023 03:59 PM] |
| CLERK ORDER: The $505 appellate filing and docketing fee has not been paid and is due. Appellant is directed to either pay the fee in the district court or file a motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis in this court within 28 days of the date of this order. If appellant does not pay the fee or move for IFP status by 02/28/2023, this appeal may be dismissed for failure to prosecute without further notice. [5241004] [23-1187] (CMH) [Entered: 01/31/2023 04:00 PM] |
| CLERK ORDER: If the original file of the United States District Court is available for review in electronic format, the court will rely on the electronic version of the record in its review. The appendices required by Eighth Circuit Rule 30A shall not be required. In accordance with Eighth Circuit Local Rule 30A(a)(2), the Clerk of the United States District Court is requested to forward to this Court forthwith any portions of the original record which are not available in an electronic format through PACER, including any documents maintained in paper format or filed under seal, exhibits, administrative records and state court files. These documents should be submitted within 10 days. [5241008] [23-1187] (CMH) [Entered: 01/31/2023 04:02 PM] |
| Prisoner case docketed. [5240993] [23-1187] (CMH) [Entered: 01/31/2023 03:54 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.