Charles Evans v. United States
Petitioner / Appellant: Charles Robert Evans
Respondent / Appellee: United States of America
Case Number: 23-1195
Filed: February 1, 2023
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Vacate Sentence
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on February 23, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
February 23, 2023 CASE SUBMITTED Ad Panel Submission before Judges Raymond W. Gruender, Duane Benton, Bobby E. Shepherd in St. Louis [5248552] [23-1195] (BNW) [Entered: 02/23/2023 02:46 PM]
February 23, 2023 JUDGMENT FILED - Application for Certificate of Appealability is denied [ # 5246164-2 ]. RAYMOND W. GRUENDER, DUANE BENTON and BOBBY E. SHEPHERD Adp Feb 2023 [5248556] [23-1195] (BNW) [Entered: 02/23/2023 02:55 PM]
February 16, 2023 RECORD FILED - SEALED RECORDS, Comments: 1 envelope containing Sealed District Court documents #3 and #8 [Copies do not return to the District Court at end of case], Source Location: USDC / NICR [5246628] [23-1195] (STL) [Entered: 02/16/2023 10:22 AM]
February 16, 2023 RECORD FILED - SEALED PSI REPORT, 1 volumes, Comments: 1 volume, 3 copies of Sealed PSI Report, Addendum, and Sentencing Worksheet, Source Location: USDC / NICR [5246614] [23-1195] (STL) [Entered: 02/16/2023 10:12 AM]
February 15, 2023 DOCUMENT FILED - Certificate of service for application for certificate of appealability filed by Mr. Charles Robert Evans. w/service 02/15/2023. [5246293] [23-1195] (CMH) [Entered: 02/15/2023 12:18 PM]
February 14, 2023 APPLICATION for Certificate of Appealability with appendix, filed by Appellant Mr. Charles Robert Evans w/service 02/15/2023. [5246164] [23-1195] (CMH) [Entered: 02/15/2023 09:57 AM]
February 1, 2023 Originating court document filed consisting of notice of appeal, docket entries, Order and Judgment 12/13/2022 and Order 01/11/2023. [5241470] [23-1195] (CMH) [Entered: 02/01/2023 03:06 PM]
February 1, 2023 CLERK ORDER: If the original file of the United States District Court is available for review in electronic format, the court will rely on the electronic version of the record in its review. The appendices required by Eighth Circuit Rule 30A shall not be required. In accordance with Eighth Circuit Local Rule 30A(a)(2), the Clerk of the United States District Court is requested to forward to this Court forthwith any portions of the original record which are not available in an electronic format through PACER, including any documents maintained in paper format or filed under seal, exhibits, administrative records and state court files. These documents should be submitted within 10 days. [5241471] [23-1195] (CMH) [Entered: 02/01/2023 03:07 PM]
February 1, 2023 Prisoner case docketed. [5241459] [23-1195] (CMH) [Entered: 02/01/2023 03:00 PM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Charles Evans v. United States
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner / appellant: Charles Robert Evans
Represented By: Charles Robert Evans
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent / appellee: United States of America
Represented By: Dan Chatham
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?