Tumey, LLP, et al v. Mycroft AI, Inc., et al
Plaintiff / Appellant: Tumey, LLP and Tod T. Tumey
Defendant / Appellee: Mycroft AI, Inc., Joshua Montgomery and Michael Lewis
Case Number: 23-1214
Filed: February 6, 2023
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Racketeer Influenced & Corrupt Og

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed Description
October 24, 2023 Summary Tumey, LLP v. Mycroft AI, Inc.

Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on April 3, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
April 3, 2023 RECORD FILED - JOINT APPENDIX, 4 volumes, Comments: 3 copies of 4 volumes each [5261021] [23-1004, 23-1214] (NDG) [Entered: 04/03/2023 10:54 AM]
March 30, 2023 Paper copies Appellant/Petitioner Brief, [ # 5258886-2 ] filed by Tod T. Tumey and Tumey, LLP in 23-1004, 23-1214 10 paper copies received w/Addendum attached [5261152] [23-1004, 23-1214] (NDG) [Entered: 04/03/2023 01:16 PM]
March 29, 2023 Record Deficiency Sent to Attorney Mr. Eric Michael Adams for Appellants Tumey, LLP and Tod T. Tumey in 23-1004, 23-1214. Record Deficiency due on 04/03/2023. [5259879-1] [23-1004, 23-1214] (NDG) [Entered: 03/29/2023 02:17 PM]
March 27, 2023 APPELLANT brief of Tumey, LLP and Tod T. Tumey in 23-1004, 23-1214 submitted for review. The time for filing the subsequent brief (if any) does not begin to run until the brief has been approved and filed. To open/view this brief, you must first login to CM/ECF and then open the document link in your Notice of Docket Activity. Only direct recipients on accounts can open this document. [5258829] [23-1004, 23-1214] (EMA) [Entered: 03/27/2023 01:24 PM]
March 27, 2023 Addendum of APPELLANT submitted for review by Tumey, LLP and Tod T. Tumey in 23-1004, 23-1214. To open/view this addendum, you must first login to CM/ECF and then open the document link in your Notice of Docket Activity. [5258831] [23-1004, 23-1214] (EMA) [Entered: 03/27/2023 01:26 PM]
March 27, 2023 ADDENDUM of APPELLANT FILED by Appellants Tod T. Tumey and Tumey, LLP in 23-1004, 23-1214 , w/service 03/27/2023 [5258887] [23-1004, 23-1214] (NDG) [Entered: 03/27/2023 02:32 PM]
March 27, 2023 BRIEF FILED - APPELLANT BRIEF filed by Tod T. Tumey and Tumey, LLP in 23-1004, 23-1214 w/service 03/27/2023, Length: 21 pages 10 COPIES OF PAPER BRIEFS (WITHOUT THE APPELLATE PDF FOOTER) FROM Tod T. Tumey and Tumey, LLP due 04/03/2023 WITH certificate of service for paper briefs. Brief of Michael Lewis, Joshua Montgomery and Mycroft AI, Inc. due on 04/26/2023 [5258886] [23-1004, 23-1214] (NDG) [Entered: 03/27/2023 02:31 PM]
February 17, 2023 Certificate of transcript filed by Appellants Tumey, LLP and Tod T. Tumey in 23-1214, 23-1004. Transcript ordered for trial proceedings on December 2, 2022 [5247196] [23-1214, 23-1004] (EMA) [Entered: 02/17/2023 03:14 PM]
February 17, 2023 METHOD of appendix preparation filed by Appellants Tumey, LLP and Tod T. Tumey in 23-1214, 23-1004 - Joint Appendix - w/service 02/17/2023 [5247191] [23-1214, 23-1004] (EMA) [Entered: 02/17/2023 03:12 PM]
February 10, 2023 CLERK ORDER:Granting [ # 5244733-2 ] motion to withdraw as counsel filed by Mr. David Louis Marcus. Mr. David Louis Marcus for Mr. Michael Lewis and Mycroft AI, Inc. in 23-1004, 23-1214 has been granted leave to withdraw from this case. [5245024] [23-1004, 23-1214] (NDG) [Entered: 02/10/2023 03:56 PM]
February 10, 2023 MOTION to withdraw as retained counsel, filed by Attorney Mr. David Louis Marcus for Appellees Mr. Michael Lewis and Mycroft AI, Inc. in 23-1004, Attorney Mr. David Louis Marcus for Appellees Mycroft AI, Inc. and Mr. Michael Lewis in 23-1214 w/service 02/10/2023. [5244733] [23-1004, 23-1214] (DLM) [Entered: 02/10/2023 12:22 PM]
February 10, 2023 APPEARANCE filed by Eric M. Adams for Appellants Tumey, LLP and Tod T. Tumey w/service 02/10/2023 [5244926] [23-1214] (EMA) [Entered: 02/10/2023 02:49 PM]
February 9, 2023 CORPORATE disclosure statement filed by Appellant Tumey, LLP in 23-1004, 23-1214. - FOR CAL [5244133] [23-1004, 23-1214] (EMA) [Entered: 02/09/2023 09:14 AM]
February 9, 2023 APPEARANCE filed by Robert A. Horn for Appellees Mr. Michael Lewis, Joshua Montgomery and Mycroft AI, Inc. w/service 02/09/2023 [5244223] [23-1214] (RAH) [Entered: 02/09/2023 10:55 AM]
February 9, 2023 CORPORATE disclosure statement filed by Appellee Mycroft AI, Inc.. - FOR CAL [5244225] [23-1214] (RAH) [Entered: 02/09/2023 10:56 AM]
February 9, 2023 APPEARANCE filed by Andrea S. McMurtry for Appellees Mr. Michael Lewis, Joshua Montgomery and Mycroft AI, Inc. w/service 02/09/2023 [5244227] [23-1214] (ASM) [Entered: 02/09/2023 10:58 AM]
February 6, 2023 Originating court document filed consisting of notice of appeal, Amended Judgment 1/27/23, docket entries, [5242403] [23-1214] (AEV) [Entered: 02/06/2023 10:24 AM]
February 6, 2023 CONSOLIDATED BRIEFING SCHEDULE SET AS FOLLOWS: Transcript due on or before 03/20/2023. Appendix due 03/28/2023. BRIEF APPELLANT, Tod T. Tumey and Tumey, LLP due 03/28/2023 Appellee brief is due 30 days from the date the court issues the Notice of Docket Activity filing the brief of appellant. [5242404] [23-1004, 23-1214] (AEV) [Entered: 02/06/2023 10:25 AM]
February 6, 2023 Civil case docketed. [5242396] [23-1214, 23-1004] (AEV) [Entered: 02/06/2023 10:19 AM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Tumey, LLP, et al v. Mycroft AI, Inc., et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellant: Tumey, LLP
Represented By: Eric Michael Adams
Represented By: Adam M. Helleck
Represented By: Cameron Leisz
Represented By: Brian J. Madden
Represented By: Kyle A. Pinkerton
Represented By: Jared R. Woodfill
Represented By: David K. Wooten
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellant: Tod T. Tumey
Represented By: Eric Michael Adams
Represented By: Adam M. Helleck
Represented By: Cameron Leisz
Represented By: Brian J. Madden
Represented By: Kyle A. Pinkerton
Represented By: Jared R. Woodfill
Represented By: David K. Wooten
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: Mycroft AI, Inc.
Represented By: Robert A. Horn
Represented By: David Louis Marcus
Represented By: Andrea S. McMurtry
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: Joshua Montgomery
Represented By: Robert A. Horn
Represented By: Andrea S. McMurtry
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: Michael Lewis
Represented By: Robert A. Horn
Represented By: David Louis Marcus
Represented By: Andrea S. McMurtry
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?