Larry Rice v. Interfood, Inc., et al
| Larry Rice |
| Interfood, Inc. and Tepco, B.V. |
| 23-1304 |
| February 14, 2023 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit |
| Other Contract Actions |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 7, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| RESPONSE in opposition to motion for summary affirmance [ # 5262123-2 ], filed by Party Mr. Larry Rice , w/service 04/07/2023. [5263147] [23-1304]--[Edited 04/07/2023 to correct docket text by NDG] (LR) [Entered: 04/07/2023 02:11 PM] |
| MOTION to Suspend Briefing and for Summary Affirmance, filed by Attorney Mr. Paul L. Brusati for Appellees Interfood and Tepco, B.V. w/service 04/05/2023. [5262123] [23-1304]--[Edited 04/05/2023 to add abeyance and summary judgment relief by NDG] (PLB) [Entered: 04/05/2023 12:33 PM] |
| CLERK LETTER sent to hold briefing schedule in abeyance pending disposition of the motion for summary affirmance. [5262209] [23-1304] (NDG) [Entered: 04/05/2023 02:19 PM] |
| BRIEF FILED - APPELLANT BRIEF filed by Mr. Larry Rice. w/service 03/24/2023, Length: 9,111 words. Copies in file: 5 Brief of Interfood and Tepco, B.V. due on 04/24/2023 [5258483] [23-1304] (NDG) [Entered: 03/24/2023 02:59 PM] |
| ADDENDUM of APPELLANT FILED by Appellant Mr. Larry Rice, w/service 03/24/2023 [5258490] [23-1304] (NDG) [Entered: 03/24/2023 03:09 PM] |
| Addendum of APPELLANT submitted for review by Mr. Larry Rice. To open/view this addendum, you must first login to CM/ECF and then open the document link in your Notice of Docket Activity. [5258459] [23-1304] (LR) [Entered: 03/24/2023 02:35 PM] |
| APPELLANT brief of Mr. Larry Rice submitted for review. The time for filing the subsequent brief (if any) does not begin to run until the brief has been approved and filed. To open/view this brief, you must first login to CM/ECF and then open the document link in your Notice of Docket Activity. Only direct recipients on accounts can open this document. [5258454] [23-1304] (LR) [Entered: 03/24/2023 02:29 PM] |
| CORPORATE disclosure statement filed by Appellee Tepco, B.V.. - FOR CAL [5246919] [23-1304] (PLB) [Entered: 02/17/2023 08:31 AM] |
| CORPORATE disclosure statement filed by Appellee Interfood. - FOR CAL [5246918] [23-1304] (PLB) [Entered: 02/17/2023 08:30 AM] |
| APPEARANCE filed by Paul L. Brusati for Appellees Interfood and Tepco, B.V. w/service 02/16/2023 [5246736] [23-1304] (PLB) [Entered: 02/16/2023 12:57 PM] |
| Originating court document filed consisting of notice of appeal, Opinion, Memorandum and Order 4/9/20, Order of Dismissal 4/9/20, Opinion, Memorandum and Order 8/4/20, Order 10/21/22, Judmgent 10/21/22, Notice of Execution 11/22/22, Order 2/1/23, docket entries, [5245850] [23-1304] (AEV) [Entered: 02/14/2023 01:58 PM] |
| BRIEFING SCHEDULE SET AS FOLLOWS: If the original file of the U.S. District Court is available for review in electronic format, the court will rely on the electronic version of the record in its review. The appendices required by 8th Circuit Rule 30A shall not be required. In accordance with 8th Circuit Local Rule 30A (a)(2), the clerk of the United States District Court is requested to forward to this Court forthwith any portions of the original record which are not available in an electronic format or filed under seal, exhibits, administrative records and state court files. BRIEF OF APPELLANT Larry Rice due 03/27/2023. Appellee brief is due 30 days from the date the court issues the Notice of Docket Activity filing the brief of appellant. [5245851] [23-1304] (AEV) [Entered: 02/14/2023 01:58 PM] |
| Civil case docketed. [5245846] [23-1304] (AEV) [Entered: 02/14/2023 01:53 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
