In Re: William Davis, Jr.
In re: William Scott Davis, Jr. |
23-1327 |
February 16, 2023 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit |
Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 24, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
MANDATE ISSUED. [5248941] [23-1327] (AT) [Entered: 02/24/2023 02:37 PM] |
JUDGMENT FILED - Denying [ # 5246913-2 ] petition for writ of mandamus filed by Petitioner Mr. William Scott Davis, Jr.. Mandate shall issue forthwith., DENIED. JAMES B. LOKEN, DAVID R. STRAS and JONATHAN A. KOBES Adp Feb 2023 [5248929] [23-1327] (AT) [Entered: 02/24/2023 02:26 PM] |
CASE SUBMITTED Ad Panel Submission before Judges James B. Loken, David R. Stras, Jonathan A. Kobes in St. Louis [5248926] [23-1327] (AT) [Entered: 02/24/2023 02:25 PM] |
PETITION for Writ of Mandamus (Rec'd by MAIL) filed by Petitioner Mr. William Scott Davis, Jr. w/service 02/16/2023 [5246913] [23-1327] (CBO) [Entered: 02/17/2023 08:24 AM] |
ORIGINAL PROCEEDING case docketed. [5246912] [23-1327] (CBO) [Entered: 02/17/2023 08:23 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Search for this case: In Re: William Davis, Jr. | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Petitioner: In re: William Scott Davis, Jr. | |
Represented By: | William Scott Davis Jr. |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.