Darrell Woods v. Wesley Fluharty, et al
| Darrell Woods |
| Wesley Fluharty, John and Jane Doe 1, John and Jane Doe 2, Darcie Bolin, Caseworker, Michael Vinson, Correctional Officer III, Hollie Vandergriff, Caseworker, Lorene Armstong, Functional Unit Manager, Cecily Reese, Chance Martinez, Ashley Goodman, Unknown Womack, Jesse Sites, David Worley, Charles Reed, Timothy Seabaugh, John and Jane Doe 3, Acting Assistant Warden, John and Jane Doe 4, Acting Assistant Warden and Clifton Cossey |
| 23-1340 |
| February 22, 2023 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit |
| Prisoner - Civil Rights |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 31, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| APPEARANCE filed by Daniel M. Greenfield for Appellant Mr. Darrell Woods w/service 03/31/2023 [5260579] [23-1340] (DMG) [Entered: 03/31/2023 09:47 AM] |
| CLERK ORDER: The motion to set a briefing schedule by Mr. Benjamin T. Gunning for Apellant Mr. Darrell Woods, [ # 5260043-2 ] is hereby ordered taken with the case for consideration by the panel to which this case is submitted for disposition on the merits. - FOR CAL [5260097] [23-1340] (CMH) [Entered: 03/30/2023 08:51 AM] |
| UPDATED fee status - [Case Number 23-1340: paid - cs on 3/10/2023 in district court] [5260103] [23-1340] (CMH) [Entered: 03/30/2023 08:53 AM] |
| MOTION to set briefing schedule, filed by Attorney Mr. Benjamin T. Gunning for Appellant Mr. Darrell Woods w/service 03/29/2023. [5260043] [23-1340] (BTG) [Entered: 03/29/2023 05:15 PM] |
| APPEARANCE filed by Benjamin Gunning for Appellant Mr. Darrell Woods w/service 03/10/2023 [5253984] [23-1340] (BTG) [Entered: 03/10/2023 03:07 PM] |
| APPEARANCE filed by Devi M. Rao for Appellant Mr. Darrell Woods w/service 03/10/2023 [5253983] [23-1340] (DMR) [Entered: 03/10/2023 03:05 PM] |
| RESPONSE in opposition to clerk order pay full filing fee [ # 5247906-2 ] with inmate account statement, filed by Appellant Mr. Darrell Woods , w/service 03/06/2023. [5252152] [23-1340] (CMH) [Entered: 03/06/2023 04:03 PM] |
| Originating court document filed consisting of notice of appeal, docket entries, Memorandum & Order and Order 2/3/2023. [5247900] [23-1340] (CMH) [Entered: 02/22/2023 09:55 AM] |
| CLERK ORDER: The district Court has determined that Appellant has three strikes under 28 U.S.C Section 1915(g). Accordingly, Appellant may not proceed in this appeal without first paying the full appellate docketing fee. Appellant is directed to pay to the district court the appellate docketing fee of $505, or to file a pleading in this court explaining why Appellant is eligible to proceed without pre-payment of the fee. If appellant fails to either pay the fee or respond to this order within 30 days of the date of this order, the appeal will be dismissed for failure to prosecute. Compliance is due 03/24/2023. [5247906] [23-1340] (CMH) [Entered: 02/22/2023 09:59 AM] |
| CLERK ORDER:If the original file of the United States District Court is available for review in electronic format, the court will rely on the electronic version of the record in its review. The appendices required by Eighth Circuit Rule 30A shall not be required. In accordance with Eighth Circuit Local Rule 30A(a)(2), the Clerk of the United States District Court is requested to forward to this Court forthwith any portions of the original record which are not available in an electronic format through PACER, including any documents maintained in paper format or filed under seal, exhibits, administrative records and state court files. These documents should be submitted within 10 days. [5247916] [23-1340] (CMH) [Entered: 02/22/2023 10:05 AM] |
| Prisoner case docketed. [5247875] [23-1340] (CMH) [Entered: 02/22/2023 09:39 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
