Zeckeya Perry v. Dexter Payne
Zeckeya Perry |
Dexter Payne, Director, Arkansas Department of Correction |
23-1391 |
February 28, 2023 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit |
Habeas Corpus |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 24, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
MANDATE ISSUED. [5268112] [23-1391] (BNW) [Entered: 04/24/2023 09:10 AM] |
JUDGMENT FILED - Application for Certificate of Appealability is denied. The motion to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis filed by Appellant Mr. Zeckeya Perry is denied as moot [ # 5258399-2 ]. STEVEN M. COLLOTON, DUANE BENTON and JANE KELLY Adp Mar 2023 [5261352] [23-1391] (BNW) [Entered: 04/03/2023 04:32 PM] |
CASE SUBMITTED Ad Panel Submission before Judges Steven M. Colloton, Duane Benton, Jane Kelly in St. Louis [5261336] [23-1391] (BNW) [Entered: 04/03/2023 04:24 PM] |
MOTION for leave to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis w/attached affidavit, filed by Appellant Mr. Zeckeya Perry. [5258399] [23-1391] (AEV) [Entered: 03/24/2023 12:58 PM] |
APPEARANCE filed by Christian Harris for Appellee Dexter Payne w/service 03/01/2023 [5250433] [23-1391] (CH) [Entered: 03/01/2023 10:13 AM] |
Originating court document filed consisting of notice of appeal, Recommended Disposition 1/25/17, Order 8/24/17, Judgment 8/24/17, Order Denying IFP 2/3/23, docket entries, [5250189] [23-1391] (AEV) [Entered: 02/28/2023 04:08 PM] |
CLERK ORDER:The $505 appellate filing and docketing fee has not been paid and is due. Appellant is directed to either pay the fee in the district court or file a motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis in this court within 28 days of the date of this order. If appellant does not pay the fee or move for IFP status by 03/28/2023, this appeal may be dismissed for failure to prosecute without further notice. [5250190] [23-1391] (AEV) [Entered: 02/28/2023 04:09 PM] |
CLERK ORDER:If the original file of the United States District Court is available for review in electronic format, the court will rely on the electronic version of the record in its review. The appendices required by Eighth Circuit Rule 30A shall not be required. In accordance with Eighth Circuit Local Rule 30A(a)(2), the Clerk of the United States District Court is requested to forward to this Court forthwith any portions of the original record which are not available in an electronic format through PACER, including any documents maintained in paper format or filed under seal, exhibits, administrative records and state court files. These documents should be submitted within 10 days. [5250193] [23-1391] (AEV) [Entered: 02/28/2023 04:10 PM] |
Prisoner case docketed. [5250185] [23-1391] (AEV) [Entered: 02/28/2023 04:05 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Search for this case: Zeckeya Perry v. Dexter Payne | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff / appellant: Zeckeya Perry | |
Represented By: | Zeckeya Perry |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant / appellee: Dexter Payne, Director, Arkansas Department of Correction | |
Represented By: | Christian Harris |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.