William Carter v. Valerie Huhn
William Billy Gene Carter |
Valerie Huhn |
23-1435 |
March 7, 2023 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit |
Habeas Corpus |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 24, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
MANDATE ISSUED. [5268134] [23-1435] (MTB) [Entered: 04/24/2023 09:51 AM] |
CASE SUBMITTED Ad Panel Submission before Judges James B. Loken, Ralph R. Erickson, L. Steven Grasz in St. Louis [5261297] [23-1435] (MTB) [Entered: 04/03/2023 04:04 PM] |
JUDGMENT FILED - Application for Certificate of Appealability is denied.; Denying [ # 5257318-2 ] Application for certificate of appealability filed by Appellant Mr. William Billy Gene Carter., Denying [ # 5260317-2 ] Second Application for certificate of appealability filed by Appellant Mr. William Billy Gene Carter. JAMES B. LOKEN, RALPH R. ERICKSON and L. STEVEN GRASZ Adp Mar 2023 [5261311] [23-1435] (MTB) [Entered: 04/03/2023 04:12 PM] |
LETTER from Appellant Mr. William Billy Gene Carter regarding request for copy of docket sheet (docket sheet mailed). w/service 03/30/2023 [5260320] [23-1435] (AEV) [Entered: 03/30/2023 01:28 PM] |
SECOND APPLICATION for Certificate of Appealability, filed by Appellant Mr. William Billy Gene Carter w/service 03/30/2023 [5260317] [23-1435] (AEV) [Entered: 03/30/2023 01:26 PM] |
APPLICATION for Certificate of Appealability, filed by Appellant Mr. William Billy Gene Carter w/service 03/16/2023 [5257318] [23-1435] (AEV) [Entered: 03/21/2023 03:34 PM] |
LETTER from Appellant Mr. William Billy Gene Carter requesting copies of his notice of appeal and app for COA (Copies mailed). w/service 03/17/2023 [5256403] [23-1435] (AEV) [Entered: 03/17/2023 03:28 PM] |
Originating court document filed consisting of notice of appeal, Memorandum and Order 2/27/23, Judgment 2/27/23, docket entries, [5252539] [23-1435] (AEV) [Entered: 03/07/2023 02:30 PM] |
CLERK ORDER:If the original file of the United States District Court is available for review in electronic format, the court will rely on the electronic version of the record in its review. The appendices required by Eighth Circuit Rule 30A shall not be required. In accordance with Eighth Circuit Local Rule 30A(a)(2), the Clerk of the United States District Court is requested to forward to this Court forthwith any portions of the original record which are not available in an electronic format through PACER, including any documents maintained in paper format or filed under seal, exhibits, administrative records and state court files. These documents should be submitted within 10 days. [5252543] [23-1435] (AEV) [Entered: 03/07/2023 02:32 PM] |
Prisoner case docketed. [5252509] [23-1435] (AEV) [Entered: 03/07/2023 01:53 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Search for this case: William Carter v. Valerie Huhn | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Petitioner / appellant: William Billy Gene Carter | |
Represented By: | William Billy Gene Carter |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Respondent / appellee: Valerie Huhn | |
Represented By: | Andrew Crane |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.