Tyrone Strother v. State of Minnesota, et al
Petitioner / Appellant: Tyrone Michael Strother
Respondent / Appellee: State of Minnesota, Tracy Beltz, Warden, MCF - Faribault, Keith M. Ellison, Minnesota Attorney General and Linda Marie Freyer
Case Number: 23-1439
Filed: March 8, 2023
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on April 19, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
April 19, 2023 PETITION for rehearing by panel filed by Appellant Mr. Tyrone Michael Strother w/service by USCA8 04/19/2023 [5266928] [23-1439] (MTB) [Entered: 04/19/2023 01:47 PM]
April 5, 2023 MOTION for extension of time to file petition for rehearing until 04/20/2023, filed by Appellant Mr. Tyrone Michael Strother w/service by USCA8 04/05/2023. [5262043] [23-1439] (MTB) [Entered: 04/05/2023 11:22 AM]
April 5, 2023 CLERK ORDER:Granting [ # 5262043-2 ] motion for extension of time to file rehearing filed by Appellant Mr. Tyrone Michael Strother. Petition for Rehearing due on 04/20/2023 [5262048] [23-1439] (MTB) [Entered: 04/05/2023 11:23 AM]
March 27, 2023 DOCUMENT FILED - Application for COA filed by Mr. Tyrone Michael Strother. w/service by USCA8 03/27/2023 [5258848] [23-1439] No action taken as it crossed in the mail with the judgment. (MTB) [Entered: 03/27/2023 01:51 PM]
March 23, 2023 JUDGMENT FILED - Application for Certificate of Appealability is denied. JAMES B. LOKEN, RAYMOND W. GRUENDER and RALPH R. ERICKSON Adp Mar 2023 [5258066] [23-1439] (MTB) [Entered: 03/23/2023 02:09 PM]
March 22, 2023 CASE SUBMITTED Ad Panel Submission before Judges James B. Loken, Raymond W. Gruender, Ralph R. Erickson in St. Louis [5258065] [23-1439] (MTB) [Entered: 03/23/2023 02:07 PM]
March 14, 2023 Originating court document filed consisting of order dated 03/14/2023 denying certificate of appealability. [5254760] [23-1439] (CBO) [Entered: 03/14/2023 10:48 AM]
March 13, 2023 CLERK ORDER: for limited remand. This case is remanded to the district court for a determination of whether to issue a certificate of appealability, with directions that, if granted, the COA specify the issue or issues that are to be considered on appeal. See 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2253; Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 22(b); United States v. Lambros, 404 F.3d 1034 (8th Cir. 2005);Tiedeman v. Benson, 122 F.3d (8th Cir. 1997) [5254490] [23-1439] (CBO) [Entered: 03/13/2023 03:16 PM]
March 9, 2023 APPEARANCE filed by Linda M. Freyer for Appellees Tracy Beltz, Mr. Keith M. Ellison, Ms. Linda Marie Freyer and State of Minnesota w/service 03/09/2023 [5253179] [23-1439] (LMF) [Entered: 03/09/2023 07:58 AM]
March 8, 2023 Originating court document filed consisting of docket entries, Order filed 2/10/2023, and Notice of Appeal filed 3/6/2023. [5252803] [23-1439] (CBO) [Entered: 03/08/2023 09:57 AM]
March 8, 2023 CLERK ORDER:If the original file of the United States District Court is available for review in electronic format, the court will rely on the electronic version of the record in its review. The appendices required by Eighth Circuit Rule 30A shall not be required. In accordance with Eighth Circuit Local Rule 30A(a)(2), the Clerk of the United States District Court is requested to forward to this Court forthwith any portions of the original record which are not available in an electronic format through PACER, including any documents maintained in paper format or filed under seal, exhibits, administrative records and state court files. These documents should be submitted within 10 days. [5252806] [23-1439] (CBO) [Entered: 03/08/2023 09:58 AM]
March 8, 2023 Prisoner case docketed. [5252797] [23-1439] (CBO) [Entered: 03/08/2023 09:52 AM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Tyrone Strother v. State of Minnesota, et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner / appellant: Tyrone Michael Strother
Represented By: Tyrone Michael Strother
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent / appellee: State of Minnesota
Represented By: Matthew Frank
Represented By: Linda Marie Freyer
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent / appellee: Tracy Beltz, Warden, MCF - Faribault
Represented By: Matthew Frank
Represented By: Linda Marie Freyer
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent / appellee: Keith M. Ellison, Minnesota Attorney General
Represented By: Matthew Frank
Represented By: Linda Marie Freyer
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent / appellee: Linda Marie Freyer
Represented By: Matthew Frank
Represented By: Linda Marie Freyer
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?