In re: Thirplus Moose Bey
In re: Thirplus Moose Bey |
23-1470 |
March 13, 2023 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit |
Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 15, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
MANDATE ISSUED. [5255512] [23-1470] (CNL) [Entered: 03/15/2023 02:43 PM] |
JUDGMENT FILED - Denying [ # 5254790-2 ] petition for writ of mandamus filed by Petitioner Mr. Thirplus Moose Bey. Mandate shall issue forthwith. DENIED. JAMES B. LOKEN, RAYMOND W. GRUENDER and RALPH R. ERICKSON Adp Mar 2023 [5255506] [23-1470] (CNL) [Entered: 03/15/2023 02:39 PM] |
CASE SUBMITTED Ad Panel Submission before Judges James B. Loken, Raymond W. Gruender, Ralph R. Erickson in St. Louis [5255503] [23-1470] (CNL) [Entered: 03/15/2023 02:38 PM] |
PETITION for Writ of Mandamus (Rec'd by MAIL) filed by Petitioner Mr. Thirplus Moose Bey w/service 03/14/2023 [5254790] [23-1470] (CAH) [Entered: 03/14/2023 11:22 AM] |
ORIGINAL PROCEEDING case docketed. [5254787] [23-1470] (CAH) [Entered: 03/14/2023 11:21 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Search for this case: In re: Thirplus Moose Bey | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Petitioner: In re: Thirplus Moose Bey | |
Represented By: | Thirplus Moose Bey |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.