Samuel McKaig v. State of Arkansas
| Samuel Tobin McKaig |
| State of Arkansas |
| 23-1491 |
| March 15, 2023 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit |
| Habeas Corpus |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 25, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| DOCUMENT FILED - letter and duplicate of notice of appeal filed by Mr. Samuel Tobin McKaig. [5269756] [23-1491] (AEV) [Entered: 04/26/2023 03:22 PM] |
| CLERK ORDER:the second motion to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis filed by Appellant Mr. Samuel Tobin McKaig in 23-1491 , [ # 5264851-2 ] is hereby ordered taken with the case for consideration by the panel to which this case is submitted for disposition on the merits. - FOR CAL [5264852] [23-1491] (AEV) [Entered: 04/13/2023 09:45 AM] |
| SECOND MOTION for leave to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis with cover letter, filed by Appellant Mr. Samuel Tobin McKaig. [5264851] [23-1491] (AEV) [Entered: 04/13/2023 09:43 AM] |
| MOTION for leave to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis w/attached affidavit, filed by Appellant Mr. Samuel Tobin McKaig. [5261373] [23-1491] (AEV) [Entered: 04/03/2023 04:51 PM] |
| CLERK ORDER:If the original file of the United States District Court is available for review in electronic format, the court will rely on the electronic version of the record in its review. The appendices required by Eighth Circuit Rule 30A shall not be required. In accordance with Eighth Circuit Local Rule 30A(a)(2), the Clerk of the United States District Court is requested to forward to this Court forthwith any portions of the original record which are not available in an electronic format through PACER, including any documents maintained in paper format or filed under seal, exhibits, administrative records and state court files. These documents should be submitted within 10 days. [5255388] [23-1491] (AEV) [Entered: 03/15/2023 12:11 PM] |
| Originating court document filed consisting of notice of appeal, Proposed Findings and Recommendations 1/18/23, Order 2/6/23, Judgment 2/6/23, Order 3/14/23, docket entries, [5255374] [23-1491] (AEV) [Entered: 03/15/2023 12:07 PM] |
| CLERK ORDER:The $505 appellate filing and docketing fee has not been paid and is due. Appellant is directed to either pay the fee in the district court or file a motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis in this court within 28 days of the date of this order. If appellant does not pay the fee or move for IFP status by 04/12/2023, this appeal may be dismissed for failure to prosecute without further notice. [5255383] [23-1491] (AEV) [Entered: 03/15/2023 12:09 PM] |
| Prisoner case docketed. [5255367] [23-1491] (AEV) [Entered: 03/15/2023 12:04 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Samuel McKaig v. State of Arkansas | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff / appellant: Samuel Tobin McKaig | |
| Represented By: | Samuel Tobin McKaig |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant / appellee: State of Arkansas | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
