Kevin Sullivan v. Felisha Rowland, et al
Kevin James Sullivan |
Felisha Rowland, Greene County Detention Center, Dane Barnum, Lieutenant, Greene County Detention Center and Doe, "Sgt. Jammie" |
23-1639 |
April 4, 2023 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit |
Prison Condition |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 19, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
LETTER from Appellant Mr. Kevin James Sullivan in 22-3592, 23-1639 regarding errors he made in submitting documents for filing w/service 05/23/2023. [5280159] [22-3592, 23-1639] (BNW) [Entered: 05/23/2023 04:29 PM] |
LETTER from Appellant Mr. Kevin James Sullivan in 23-1639, 22-3592 regarding errors he made in submitting documents for filing, w/service 05/23/2023. [5279798] [23-1639, 22-3592] (CMH) [Entered: 05/23/2023 10:21 AM] |
DOCUMENT FILED - titled "Statement of Relief" filed by Mr. Kevin James Sullivan. w/service 05/23/2023. [5279812] [23-1639] (CMH) [Entered: 05/23/2023 10:38 AM] |
CLERK ORDER: The motion for appointment of counsel filed by Appellant Mr. Kevin James Sullivan [ # 5271139-2 ] is hereby ordered taken with the case for consideration by the panel to which this case is submitted for disposition on the merits. - FOR CAL [5271152] [23-1639] (CMH) [Entered: 05/01/2023 10:50 AM] |
**DOCUMENT FILED- APPELLANT ERROR WRONG CASE NUMBER** - titled "Violation of my due process and double jeopardy" filed by Mr. Kevin James Sullivan, w/service 05/01/2023. [5271145] [23-1639]--[Edited 05/23/2023 by CMH document locked and transferred to case 22-3592 at appellant's request on 5/19/2023.] (CMH) [Entered: 05/01/2023 10:45 AM] |
MOTION for appointment of counsel, filed by Appellant Mr. Kevin James Sullivan w/service 05/01/2023. [5271139] [23-1639] (CMH) [Entered: 05/01/2023 10:42 AM] |
MOTION for leave to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis w/attached affidavit, filed by Appellant Mr. Kevin James Sullivan w/service 04/17/2023. [5266015] [23-1639] (CMH) [Entered: 04/17/2023 03:00 PM] |
MOTION to suppress evidence, filed by Appellant Mr. Kevin James Sullivan w/service 04/05/2023. [5262317] [23-1639] (CMH) [Entered: 04/05/2023 04:11 PM] |
Originating court document filed consisting of notice of appeal, docket entries, Proposed Findings & Recommendations 1/26/2023, Order and Judgment 3/16/2023, and Order 4/3/2023. [5261691] [23-1639] (CMH) [Entered: 04/04/2023 01:58 PM] |
CLERK ORDER: The $505 appellate filing and docketing fee has not been paid and is due. Appellant is directed to either pay the fee in the district court or file a motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis in this court within 28 days of the date of this order. If appellant does not pay the fee or move for IFP status by 05/02/2023, this appeal may be dismissed for failure to prosecute without further notice. [5261698] [23-1639] (CMH) [Entered: 04/04/2023 02:05 PM] |
CLERK ORDER: If the original file of the United States District Court is available for review in electronic format, the court will rely on the electronic version of the record in its review. The appendices required by Eighth Circuit Rule 30A shall not be required. In accordance with Eighth Circuit Local Rule 30A(a)(2), the Clerk of the United States District Court is requested to forward to this Court forthwith any portions of the original record which are not available in an electronic format through PACER, including any documents maintained in paper format or filed under seal, exhibits, administrative records and state court files. These documents should be submitted within 10 days. [5261701] [23-1639] (CMH) [Entered: 04/04/2023 02:07 PM] |
Prisoner case docketed. [5261678] [23-1639] (CMH) [Entered: 04/04/2023 01:44 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.