Jim Eis v. United States
| Jim Keith Eis |
| United States of America |
| 23-1804 |
| April 19, 2023 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit |
| Vacate Sentence |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 12, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| PETITION for enbanc rehearing and also for rehearing by panel filed by Appellant Mr. Jim Keith Eis w/service 06/12/2023 by USCA8 [5286046] [23-1804] (NDG) [Entered: 06/12/2023 03:54 PM] |
| JUDGMENT FILED - Application for Certificate of Appealability [ # 5268840-2 ] is denied. The motion to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis [ # 5275361-2 ] is denied as moot. RAYMOND W. GRUENDER, BOBBY E. SHEPHERD and JONATHAN A. KOBES Adp May 2023 [5277987] [23-1804] (NDG) [Entered: 05/17/2023 11:58 AM] |
| CASE SUBMITTED Ad Panel Submission before Judges Raymond W. Gruender, Bobby E. Shepherd, Jonathan A. Kobes in St. Louis [5277983] [23-1804] (NDG) [Entered: 05/17/2023 11:55 AM] |
| MOTION for leave to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis w/attached affidavit, filed by Appellant Mr. Jim Keith Eis w/service 05/09/2023. [5275361] [23-1804] (CMH) [Entered: 05/09/2023 03:26 PM] |
| APPLICATION for Certificate of Appealability, filed by Appellant Mr. Jim Keith Eis w/service 04/25/2023. [5268840] [23-1804] (CMH) [Entered: 04/25/2023 10:07 AM] |
| Prisoner case docketed. [5266854] [23-1804] (CMH) [Entered: 04/19/2023 11:45 AM] |
| Originating court document filed consisting of notice of appeal, docket entries, Order 8/10/2022 and Order 4/6/2023. [5266867] [23-1804] (CMH) [Entered: 04/19/2023 11:57 AM] |
| CLERK ORDER: The $505 appellate filing and docketing fee has not been paid and is due. Appellant is directed to either pay the fee in the district court or file a motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis in this court within 28 days of the date of this order. If appellant does not pay the fee or move for IFP status by 05/17/2023, this appeal may be dismissed for failure to prosecute without further notice. [5266896] [23-1804] (CMH) [Entered: 04/19/2023 12:29 PM] |
| CLERK ORDER: If the original file of the United States District Court is available for review in electronic format, the court will rely on the electronic version of the record in its review. The appendices required by Eighth Circuit Rule 30A shall not be required. In accordance with Eighth Circuit Local Rule 30A(a)(2), the Clerk of the United States District Court is requested to forward to this Court forthwith any portions of the original record which are not available in an electronic format through PACER, including any documents maintained in paper format or filed under seal, exhibits, administrative records and state court files. These documents should be submitted within 10 days. [5266908] [23-1804] (CMH) [Entered: 04/19/2023 12:51 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Jim Eis v. United States | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner / appellant: Jim Keith Eis | |
| Represented By: | Jim Keith Eis |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent / appellee: United States of America | |
| Represented By: | Melisa K. Zaehringer |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
