Perficient, Inc. v. Thomas Munley
| Spaulding Ridge, LLC |
| Perficient, Inc. |
| Thomas Munley |
| 23-2131 |
| May 8, 2023 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit |
| Other Contract Actions |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 1, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| JUDGMENT FILED -The parties have filed a joint stipulation for dismissal., The case is dismissed in accordance with Rule 42(b), Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure. Mandate shall issue forthwith. [5282982] [23-1923, 23-2131] (JJB) [Entered: 06/01/2023 04:12 PM] |
| MANDATE ISSUED. [5282985] [23-1923, 23-2131] (JJB) [Entered: 06/01/2023 04:16 PM] |
| STIPULATION for dismissal filed by Appellant Mr. Thomas Munley in 23-1923. w/service 06/01/2023 [5282869] [23-1923, 23-2131] (TDP) [Entered: 06/01/2023 02:32 PM] |
| APPEARANCE filed by Teresa Dale Pupillo for Appellee Mr. Thomas Munley w/service 05/10/2023 [5275667] [23-2131] (TDP) [Entered: 05/10/2023 11:29 AM] |
| Originating court document filed consisting of notice of cross-appeal, docket entries, Memorandum Opinion 3/31/2023 and Judgment 3/31/2023. [5274681] [23-2131] (CMH) [Entered: 05/08/2023 03:27 PM] |
| CROSS APPEAL BRIEFING SCHEDULE SET AS FOLLOWS: Transcript due on or before 06/12/2023. Appendix due 06/20/2023. BRIEF APPELLANT, Thomas Munley due 06/20/2023. Appellee/cross Appellant brief due 30 days from the date the court issues the Notice of Docket Activity filing the appellant's brief. [5274708] [23-1923, 23-2131] (CMH) [Entered: 05/08/2023 03:58 PM] |
| Civil case docketed. [5274673] [23-2131] (CMH) [Entered: 05/08/2023 03:20 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
