Stephen Morris v. Gregory Hancock
| Stephen Patrick Morris |
| Gregory Hancock, Warden |
| 23-2158 |
| May 10, 2023 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit |
| Habeas Corpus |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 6, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| CLERK ORDER:Granting [ # 5292792-2 ] motion for extension of time to file app for COA filed by Mr. Kevin L. Schriener. [5292962] [23-2158] (CAH) [Entered: 07/06/2023 10:05 AM] |
| MOTION for extension of time to file COA until 07/19/2023, filed by Attorney Mr. Kevin L. Schriener for Appellant Mr. Stephen Patrick Morris w/service 07/05/2023. [5292792] [23-2158] (KLS) [Entered: 07/05/2023 08:06 PM] |
| CLERK ORDER:Granting [ # 5288404-2 ] motion for extension of time to file app for COA filed by Mr. Kevin L. Schriener. Appellant may have until 7/5/23 to file the application. [5288665] [23-2158] (CAH) [Entered: 06/22/2023 10:55 AM] |
| MOTION for extension of time to file COA until 07/05/2023, filed by Attorney Mr. Kevin L. Schriener for Appellant Mr. Stephen Patrick Morris w/service 06/21/2023. [5288404] [23-2158] (KLS) [Entered: 06/21/2023 06:59 AM] |
| Re-mailed correspondence - case opening letter, [ # 5275771-2 ], to Mr. Stephen Patrick Morris at MECC . [23-2158] (CAH) [Entered: 06/05/2023 04:36 PM] |
| CLERK LETTER sent acknowledging that the fee was, in fact, paid at the time this appeal was docketed.. [5282974] [23-2158] (CAH) [Entered: 06/01/2023 04:05 PM] |
| UPDATED fee status - [Case Number 23-2158: paid - cs] [5281539] [23-2158] (CAH) [Entered: 05/30/2023 10:35 AM] |
| CLERK ORDER:Granting [ # 5278645-2 ] motion for extension of time to file app for COA filed by Mr. Kevin L. Schriener. Appellant may have until June 20, 2023, to file the application. [5279416] [23-2158] (CAH) [Entered: 05/22/2023 12:56 PM] |
| MOTION for extension of time to file COA until 06/20/2023, filed by Attorney Mr. Kevin L. Schriener for Appellant Mr. Stephen Patrick Morris w/service 05/18/2023. [5278645] [23-2158] (KLS) [Entered: 05/18/2023 03:20 PM] |
| APPEARANCE filed by Kevin L Schriener for Appellant Mr. Stephen Patrick Morris w/service 05/18/2023 [5278694] [23-2158] (KLS) [Entered: 05/18/2023 04:00 PM] |
| Prisoner case docketed. A corrected docketing letter was re-sent because the original letter contained an incorrect address for appellant. [5275771] [23-2158]--[Edited 05/10/2023 by CAH] (CAH) [Entered: 05/10/2023 02:14 PM] |
| Originating court document filed consisting of notice of appeal, docket entries, opinion 3/2/23, dismissal order 3/2/23, opinion 4/18/23. [5275772] [23-2158] (CAH) [Entered: 05/10/2023 02:18 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Stephen Morris v. Gregory Hancock | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner / appellant: Stephen Patrick Morris | |
| Represented By: | Stephen Patrick Morris |
| Represented By: | Kevin L. Schriener |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent / appellee: Gregory Hancock, Warden | |
| Represented By: | Habeas Unit Missouri Attorney General |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
