Cody Atkins v. Chad Pringle
| Cody Michael Atkins |
| Warden Chad Pringle |
| 23-2260 |
| May 23, 2023 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit |
| Habeas Corpus |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 5, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| MOTION for leave to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis, filed by Appellant Mr. Cody Michael Atkins w/service 06/05/2023. [5284086] [23-2260] (CBO) [Entered: 06/06/2023 09:33 AM] |
| RECORD FILED - SEALED RECORDS, Comments: 1 folder containing District Court document #10-3, 16-4, 16-7, 16-8, 16-9, 16-10, 16-11, 16-12, 16-14, 16-15, 16-17, 16-18, 16-19, 16-20, 16-21, and 16-26 [Copies do not return to the District Court at end of case], Source Location: USDC / ND [5282716] [23-2260] (STL) [Entered: 06/01/2023 11:29 AM] |
| CLERK ORDER: If the original file of the United States District Court is available for review in electronic format, the court will rely on the electronic version of the record in its review. The appendices required by Eighth Circuit Rule 30A shall not be required. In accordance with Eighth Circuit Local Rule 30A(a)(2), the Clerk of the United States District Court is requested to forward to this Court forthwith any portions of the original record which are not available in an electronic format through PACER, including any documents maintained in paper format or filed under seal, exhibits, administrative records and state court files. These documents should be submitted within 10 days. [5280064] [23-2260] (CBO) [Entered: 05/23/2023 02:44 PM] |
| CLERK ORDER: This appeal involves a child victim. In accordance with the provisions of 18 U.S.C. Section 3509(d)(2) regarding confidentiality of information and privacy protection, all papers filed with this court which disclose the name of or any information concerning a child shall be sealed. (SEE order for complete details) [5280060] [23-2260] (CBO) [Entered: 05/23/2023 02:42 PM] |
| Originating court document filed consisting of docket entries, Report and Recommendation and Order filed 3/14/2023, Order Adopting R&R filed 5/2/2023, Judgment filed 5/2/2023, and Notice of Appeal filed 5/15/2023. [5280056] [23-2260] (CBO) [Entered: 05/23/2023 02:37 PM] |
| CLERK ORDER:The $505 appellate filing and docketing fee has not been paid and is due. Appellant is directed to either pay the fee in the district court or file a motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis in this court within 28 days of the date of this order. If appellant does not pay the fee or move for IFP status by 06/20/2023, this appeal may be dismissed for failure to prosecute without further notice. [5280059] [23-2260] (CBO) [Entered: 05/23/2023 02:39 PM] |
| Prisoner case docketed. [5280048] [23-2260] (CBO) [Entered: 05/23/2023 02:28 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Cody Atkins v. Chad Pringle | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner / appellant: Cody Michael Atkins | |
| Represented By: | Cody Michael Atkins |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent / appellee: Warden Chad Pringle | |
| Represented By: | Michael T. Mahoney |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
