Thomas Clobes v. 3M Company
| Thomas Clobes |
| Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company |
| 23-2266 |
| May 24, 2023 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit |
| Jobs |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 12, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| CLERK ORDER:Granting [ # 5294973-2 ] motion for extension of time to file brief filed by Ms. Lexis Anderson. Brief of Thomas Clobes due 08/11/2023. Appendix due on 08/11/2023. [5295057] [23-2266] (JJB) [Entered: 07/12/2023 11:45 AM] |
| MOTION for extension of time to file brief until 08/11/2023, filed by Attorney Ms. Lexis Anderson for Appellant Thomas Clobes w/service 07/12/2023. [5294973] [23-2266] (LA) [Entered: 07/12/2023 10:02 AM] |
| CORPORATE disclosure statement filed by Appellee Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company. - FOR CAL [5285007] [23-2266] (PRM) [Entered: 06/08/2023 10:55 AM] |
| DESIGNATION of record filed by Appellant Thomas Clobes. w/service 06/07/2023 [5284886] [23-2266] (LA) [Entered: 06/07/2023 10:43 PM] |
| STATEMENT of issues filed by Appellant Thomas Clobes - w/service 06/07/2023. [5284887] [23-2266] (LA) [Entered: 06/07/2023 11:19 PM] |
| METHOD of appendix preparation filed by Appellant Thomas Clobes - Joint Appendix - w/service 06/07/2023 [5284885] [23-2266] (LA) [Entered: 06/07/2023 10:41 PM] |
| APPEARANCE filed by Lexis Anderson for Appellant Thomas Clobes w/service 06/07/2023 [5284770] [23-2266] (LA) [Entered: 06/07/2023 01:56 PM] |
| APPEARANCE filed by Patrick R. Martin for Appellee Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company w/service 05/25/2023 [5280792] [23-2266] (PRM) [Entered: 05/25/2023 11:09 AM] |
| Originating court document filed consisting of notice of appeal filed 5/20/2023, Order on Motion to Dismiss filed 4/20/2023, Judgment filed 4/21/2023, and docket entries, [5280333] [23-2266] (ASL) [Entered: 05/24/2023 10:58 AM] |
| BRIEFING SCHEDULE SET AS FOLLOWS: Transcript due on or before 07/03/2023. BRIEF APPELLANT, Thomas Clobes due 07/13/2023. Appendix due 07/13/2023 Appellee brief is due 30 days from the date the court issues the Notice of Docket Activity filing the brief of appellant. [5280337] [23-2266] (ASL) [Entered: 05/24/2023 11:00 AM] |
| RECORD FILED - MOTION TRANSCRIPT, 1 volumes, Comments: District Court document #24 [Only Electronic Copy Received - No Paper Copy on File], Source Location: USDC / MN, Dt. of Proceeding/Hearing: 04/20/2023, No. of Pgs.: 21, Court Reporter: Rogge, Renee [5280613] [23-2266] (STL) [Entered: 05/24/2023 04:02 PM] |
| Civil case docketed. [5280327] [23-2266] (ASL) [Entered: 05/24/2023 10:53 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Thomas Clobes v. 3M Company | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff / appellant: Thomas Clobes | |
| Represented By: | Lexis Anderson |
| Represented By: | Robert E. Barnes |
| Represented By: | Francis Herbert White III |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant / appellee: Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company | |
| Represented By: | Patrick Robert Martin |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
