Michael Tisius v. David Vandergriff
Michael A. Tisius |
David Vandergriff, Warden |
23-2314 |
May 31, 2023 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit |
Death Penalty |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 17, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Payment approved and processed for voucher filed by Mr. Keith P. O'Connor for Mr. Michael A. Tisius. Voucher No. 08AC.1572990 [5296203] [23-2314] (ARS) [Entered: 07/17/2023 12:39 PM] |
Prisoner Executed [23-2314] (HAG) [Entered: 06/12/2023 08:23 AM] |
JUDGMENT FILED - The motion to vacate the district court's order for a stay of execution is granted. The case is remanded to the district court with directions to dismiss Michael Tisius's supplemental petition for a writ of habeas corpus. Mandate shall issue forthwith. [ # 5282432-2 ] (SEE ATTACHED ORDER FOR FURTHER DETAILS. BOBBY E. SHEPHERD, RALPH R. ERICKSON and DAVID R. STRAS May 2023 [5283436] [23-2314] (AMT) [Entered: 06/02/2023 04:19 PM] |
MANDATE ISSUED. [5283446] [23-2314] (AMT) [Entered: 06/02/2023 04:39 PM] |
REPLY to response [ # 5283016-2 ] filed by Appellant Mr. David Vandergriff w/service 06/01/2023. [5283028] [23-2314] (AC) [Entered: 06/01/2023 10:10 PM] |
RESPONSE in opposition to motion to vacate stay of execution [ # 5282432-2 ] filed by Attorney Mr. Laurence E. Komp for Appellee Mr. Michael A. Tisius , w/service 06/01/2023. [5283016] [23-2314]--[Edited 06/01/2023 by EDG to add motion description] (LEK) [Entered: 06/01/2023 04:57 PM] |
JUDGE ORDER: Granting [ # 5282263-2 ] motion to exceed the word limit (motion for leave) filed by Mr. Andrew Crane. Additionally, Appellee is also allowed to exceed the word limit to the same extent. Special May 2023 [5282903] [23-2314] (EDG) [Entered: 06/01/2023 02:52 PM] |
CLERK ORDER: Appointing Ms. Elizabeth Unger Carlyle and Mr. Keith P. O'Connor for Mr. Michael A. Tisius under the Criminal Justice Act. [5282122] [23-2314] (EDG) [Entered: 05/31/2023 11:14 AM] |
Originating court document filed consisting of notice of appeal, docket entries, and Order dated 5/31/23. [5282118] [23-2314] (EDG) [Entered: 05/31/2023 11:12 AM] |
CLERK ORDER:The Federal Public Defender is hereby appointed to represent appellant in this case. [5282129] [23-2314] (EDG) [Entered: 05/31/2023 11:19 AM] |
MOTION leave to file overlength motion, filed by Attorney Mr. Andrew Crane for Appellant Mr. David Vandergriff w/service 05/31/2023. [5282263] [23-2314] (AC) [Entered: 05/31/2023 01:22 PM] |
MOTION to vacate stay of execution, filed by Attorney Mr. Andrew Crane for Appellant Mr. David Vandergriff w/service 05/31/2023. [5282432] [23-2314] (AC) [Entered: 05/31/2023 04:07 PM] |
Death Penalty case docketed. [23-2314] (EDG) [Entered: 05/31/2023 11:02 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Search for this case: Michael Tisius v. David Vandergriff | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Petitioner: Michael A. Tisius | |
Represented By: | Elizabeth Unger Carlyle |
Represented By: | Laurence E. Komp |
Represented By: | Keith P. O'Connor |
Represented By: | Michael A. Tisius |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Respondent: David Vandergriff, Warden | |
Represented By: | Andrew Crane |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.