Harold Yaritz v. State of Minnesota
Plaintiff / Appellant: Harold David Yaritz
Defendant / Appellee: State of Minnesota
Case Number: 23-2329
Filed: June 1, 2023
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Prisoner - Civil Rights
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on July 18, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
July 18, 2023 Tendered status inquiry and supplement to motion received from Appellant Mr. Harold David Yaritz [5296977] [23-2329] (CBO) [Entered: 07/18/2023 03:10 PM]
July 18, 2023 CLERK LETTER sent clarification of appeals cases. [5297031] [23-2329] (MTB) [Entered: 07/18/2023 04:02 PM]
July 18, 2023 MEMORANDUM of Appellant Mr. Harold David Yaritz in support of petition for rehearing by panel [ # 5294264-2 ]. w/service by USCA8 07/18/2023. [5297035] [23-2329] (MTB) [Entered: 07/18/2023 04:09 PM]
July 10, 2023 PETITION for rehearing by panel filed by Appellant Mr. Harold David Yaritz w/service by USCA8 07/10/2023 [5294264] [23-2329] (MTB) [Entered: 07/10/2023 03:07 PM]
July 10, 2023 Tendered Petition for Rehearing received from Appellant Mr. Harold David Yaritz [5294248] [23-2329] (CBO) [Entered: 07/10/2023 02:47 PM]
June 26, 2023 JUDGMENT FILED - This case is summarily affirmed in accordance with Eighth Circuit Rule 47A. STEVEN M. COLLOTON, RAYMOND W. GRUENDER and L. STEVEN GRASZ Adp June 2023 [5289703] [23-2329] (MTB) [Entered: 06/26/2023 10:24 AM]
June 20, 2023 CASE SUBMITTED Ad Panel Submission before Judges Steven M. Colloton, Raymond W. Gruender, L. Steven Grasz in St. Louis [5289700] [23-2329] (MTB) [Entered: 06/26/2023 10:22 AM]
June 1, 2023 Originating court document filed consisting of docket entries, Report and Recommendation filed 4/4/2023, Order on R&R filed 5/15/23, Judgment filed 5/15/2023, Notice of Appeal filed 5/30/2023, and Order on IFP/PLRA filed 5/31/2023. [5282576] [23-2329] (CBO) [Entered: 06/01/2023 09:19 AM]
June 1, 2023 CLERK ORDER: If the original file of the United States District Court is available for review in electronic format, the court will rely on the electronic version of the record in its review. The appendices required by Eighth Circuit Rule 30A shall not be required. In accordance with Eighth Circuit Local Rule 30A(a)(2), the Clerk of the United States District Court is requested to forward to this Court forthwith any portions of the original record which are not available in an electronic format through PACER, including any documents maintained in paper format or filed under seal, exhibits, administrative records and state court files. These documents should be submitted within 10 days. [5282582] [23-2329] (CBO) [Entered: 06/01/2023 09:23 AM]
June 1, 2023 Prisoner case docketed. [5282569] [23-2329] (CBO) [Entered: 06/01/2023 09:09 AM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Harold Yaritz v. State of Minnesota
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellant: Harold David Yaritz
Represented By: Harold David Yaritz
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: State of Minnesota
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?