Bailey Trent-Kettlekamp v. Richard Adams
Petitioner / Appellant: Bailey Trent-Kettlekamp
Respondent / Appellee: Richard Adams, Warden
Case Number: 23-2335
Filed: June 1, 2023
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on July 20, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
July 20, 2023 CLERK ORDER:Granting [ # 5297114-2 ] motion for extension of time to file app for COA filed by Mr. Kevin L. Schriener until August 2, 2023. [5297787] [23-2335] (AEV) [Entered: 07/20/2023 12:52 PM]
July 19, 2023 MOTION for extension of time to file COA until 08/02/2023, filed by Attorney Mr. Kevin L. Schriener for Appellant Mr. Bailey Trent-Kettlekamp w/service 07/19/2023. [5297114] [23-2335] (KLS) [Entered: 07/19/2023 06:38 AM]
June 28, 2023 UPDATED fee status - [Case Number 23-2335: In Forma Pauperis] [5290915] [23-2335] (CMH) [Entered: 06/28/2023 12:52 PM]
June 28, 2023 Originating court document filed consisting of originating district court docket text order of 06/27/2023 granting petitioner's motion for leave to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis. [5290914] [23-2335] (CMH) [Entered: 06/28/2023 12:51 PM]
June 1, 2023 CLERK ORDER: If the original file of the United States District Court is available for review in electronic format, the court will rely on the electronic version of the record in its review. The appendices required by Eighth Circuit Rule 30A shall not be required. In accordance with Eighth Circuit Local Rule 30A(a)(2), the Clerk of the United States District Court is requested to forward to this Court forthwith any portions of the original record which are not available in an electronic format through PACER, including any documents maintained in paper format or filed under seal, exhibits, administrative records and state court files. These documents should be submitted within 10 days. [5282751] [23-2335] (CMH) [Entered: 06/01/2023 11:58 AM]
June 1, 2023 Originating court document filed consisting of notice of appeal, Order 5/2/2023 and Judgment 5/2/2023, and docket entries. [5282747] [23-2335] (CMH) [Entered: 06/01/2023 11:55 AM]
June 1, 2023 CLERK ORDER: The $505 appellate filing and docketing fee has not been paid and is due. Appellant is directed to either pay the fee in the district court or file a motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis in the district court within 21 days of the date of this order. If appellant does not pay the fee or move for IFP status by 06/22/2023, a show cause order will be entered directing the appellant to show cause why this appeal should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute. [5282749] [23-2335] (CMH) [Entered: 06/01/2023 11:57 AM]
June 1, 2023 Prisoner case docketed. [5282742] [23-2335] (CMH) [Entered: 06/01/2023 11:51 AM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Bailey Trent-Kettlekamp v. Richard Adams
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner / appellant: Bailey Trent-Kettlekamp
Represented By: Kevin L. Schriener
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent / appellee: Richard Adams, Warden
Represented By: Michael Joseph Spillane
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?