In re: Brooke Henderson, et al
In re: Brooke Henderson, Jennifer Lumley and Kimberly S. Hermann |
23-2394 |
June 7, 2023 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit |
Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 9, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE filed by Attorney Mr. Edward Dean Greim for Petitioners Brooke Henderson, Kimberly S. Hermann and Jennifer Lumley correcting [ # 5285225-2 ] motion for stay. [5285321] [23-2394]--[Edited 06/09/2023 by CJO to remove "filed by null" from the docket text] (EDG) [Entered: 06/09/2023 09:48 AM] |
JUDGE ORDER: granting an administrative stay of the district court's May 24, 2023 order, pending further order of this court. Adp June 2023. [5285577] [23-2394] (CJO) [Entered: 06/09/2023 03:53 PM] |
EMERGENCY MOTION for stay, filed by Attorney Mr. Edward Dean Greim for Petitioners Brooke Henderson, Kimberly S. Hermann and Jennifer Lumley w/service 06/08/2023. [5285225] [23-2394]--[Edited 06/09/2023 by CJO to add EMERGENCY to the docket text] (EDG) [Entered: 06/08/2023 04:10 PM] |
FEE PAID FOR PETITION FOR WRIT OF Fee Amount: $500.00 Receipt Number: A08-33919-52. MANDAMUS by Mr. Edward Dean Greim for Brooke Henderson, Kimberly S. Hermann and Jennifer Lumley [5285217] [23-2394] (EDG) [Entered: 06/08/2023 03:50 PM] |
PETITION for Writ of Mandamus (Electronic) filed by Petitioners Brooke Henderson, Kimberly S. Hermann and Jennifer Lumley, w/service 06/08/2023. [5285178] [23-2394] (CJO) [Entered: 06/08/2023 02:59 PM] |
ORIGINAL PROCEEDING case docketed. [5285176] [23-2394] (CJO) [Entered: 06/08/2023 02:54 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.