Christopher Lockhart v. Siloam Springs, Arkansas, et al
| James Wilmeth, Allan Gilbert, Chase Fine, Tiffany Adams, Mike Efram and David Bailey |
| Christopher Lockhart |
| Siloam Springs, Arkansas and Detective Zachary Ware |
| 23-2642 |
| July 17, 2023 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit |
| Other Civil Rights |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
| Description |
|---|
 Lockhart v. Siloam Springs, Arkansas
|
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 12, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| ADDENDUM of APPELLANT FILED by Appellants Siloam Springs, Arkansas and Zachary Ware, w/service 09/12/2023. [5315353] [23-2642] (HAG) [Entered: 09/12/2023 10:31 AM] |
| APPELLANT brief of Siloam Springs, Arkansas and Zachary Ware submitted for review. The time for filing the subsequent brief (if any) does not begin to run until the brief has been approved and filed. To open/view this brief, you must first login to CM/ECF and then open the document link in your Notice of Docket Activity. Only direct recipients on accounts can open this document. [5315484] [23-2642]--[Edited 09/12/2023 by HAG to correct type of brief submitted] (SLM) [Entered: 09/12/2023 12:32 PM] |
| Brief deficiency notice sent to counsel, Attorney Ms. Sara Lynn Monaghan for Appellants Siloam Springs, Arkansas and Zachary Ware. [5315342] [23-2642] (HAG) [Entered: 09/12/2023 10:20 AM] |
| BRIEF FILED - APPELLANT BRIEF filed by Siloam Springs & Arkansas and Zachary Ware, w/service 09/12/2023. Length: 9,036 words. 10 COPIES OF PAPER BRIEFS (WITHOUT THE APPELLATE PDF FOOTER) FROM Siloam Springs, Arkansas and Zachary Ware due 09/18/2023 WITH certificate of service for paper briefs. Brief of Christopher Lockhart due on 10/12/2023. [5315539] [23-2642] (HAG) [Entered: 09/12/2023 01:57 PM] |
| Addendum of APPELLANT submitted for review by Zachary Ware and Siloam Springs, Arkansas. To open/view this addendum, you must first login to CM/ECF and then open the document link in your Notice of Docket Activity. [5314914] [23-2642] (SLM) [Entered: 09/11/2023 01:00 PM] |
| APPELLANT brief of Zachary Ware and Siloam Springs, Arkansas submitted for review. The time for filing the subsequent brief (if any) does not begin to run until the brief has been approved and filed. To open/view this brief, you must first login to CM/ECF and then open the document link in your Notice of Docket Activity. Only direct recipients on accounts can open this document. [5314912] [23-2642] (SLM) [Entered: 09/11/2023 12:56 PM] |
| RECORD FILED - JOINT APPENDIX, 1 volume, Comments: 3 sets (Flash drives attached to App95 & App385) [5311880] [23-2642] (HAG) [Entered: 08/30/2023 04:13 PM] |
| Record Deficiency Sent to Attorney Ms. Sara Lynn Monaghan for Appellants Siloam Springs, Arkansas and Zachary Ware. Record Deficiency due on 09/05/2023 - SEE ATTACHED NOTICE. [5311188-1] [23-2642] (HAG) [Entered: 08/29/2023 11:55 AM] |
| CLERK ORDER:Granting [ # 5310241-2 ] motion for extension of time to file brief filed by Ms. Sara Lynn Monaghan. Brief of Siloam Springs, Arkansas and Zachary Ware due 09/11/2023. Appendix due on 09/11/2023. [5310280] [23-2642] (HAG) [Entered: 08/25/2023 01:24 PM] |
| MOTION for extension of time to file brief until 09/11/2023, filed by Attorney Ms. Sara Lynn Monaghan for Appellants Siloam Springs, Arkansas and Zachary Ware w/service 08/25/2023. [5310241] [23-2642] (SLM) [Entered: 08/25/2023 12:45 PM] |
| DESIGNATION of record filed by Appellants Siloam Springs, Arkansas and Zachary Ware. w/service 08/02/2023 [5302335] [23-2642] (SLM) [Entered: 08/02/2023 01:40 PM] |
| METHOD of appendix preparation filed by Appellants Zachary Ware and Siloam Springs, Arkansas - Joint Appendix - w/service 07/31/2023 [5301345] [23-2642] (SLM) [Entered: 07/31/2023 02:45 PM] |
| RECORD FILED - EXHIBITS, Comments: 1 envelope containing Exhibit 5 (DVD) - District Court document #43-5 [Original - Return to the District Court at end of case], Source Location: USDC / WAF [5299246] [23-2642] (STL) [Entered: 07/25/2023 12:46 PM] |
| APPEARANCE filed by Sara Monaghan for Appellants Zachary Ware and Siloam Springs, Arkansas w/service 07/24/2023. **LOCKED-COUNSEL TO REFILE WITH CORRECT PARTY NAMES** [5298663] [23-2642]--[Edited 07/24/2023 by HAG to indicate locked] (SLM) [Entered: 07/24/2023 11:03 AM] |
| RECORD FILED - EXHIBITS, Comments: 1 envelope containing Exhibit B (Flash Drive) - District Court document #132-2 [Original - Return to the District Court at end of case], Source Location: USDC / WAF [5298636] [23-2642] (STL) [Entered: 07/24/2023 10:34 AM] |
| Certificate of transcript filed by Appellants Zachary Ware and Siloam Springs, Arkansas. No Transcript **LOCKED-COUNSEL TO REFILE WITH CORRECT CAPTION** [5298696] [23-2642]--[Edited 07/24/2023 by HAG to indicate locked] (SLM) [Entered: 07/24/2023 11:36 AM] |
| APPEARANCE filed by Sara Monaghan for Appellants Zachary Ware and Siloam Springs, Arkansas w/service 07/24/2023 [5298717] [23-2642] (SLM) [Entered: 07/24/2023 12:10 PM] |
| Certificate of transcript filed by Appellants Zachary Ware and Siloam Springs, Arkansas. No Transcript[5298719] [23-2642] (SLM) [Entered: 07/24/2023 12:12 PM] |
| Originating court document filed consisting of notice of appeal, docket entries, and Opinion and Order 06/22/2023. [5296046] [23-2642] (CJO) [Entered: 07/17/2023 09:42 AM] |
| BRIEFING SCHEDULE SET AS FOLLOWS: Appendix due on 08/28/2023. BRIEF OF APPELLANT Siloam Springs, Arkansas and Zachary Ware due 08/28/2023. Appellee brief is due 30 days from the date the court issues the Notice of Docket Activity filing the brief of appellant. [5296049] [23-2642] (CJO) [Entered: 07/17/2023 09:45 AM] |
| Civil case docketed. [5296044] [23-2642] (CJO) [Entered: 07/17/2023 09:39 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
