James Raper, Jr. v. Rose Braley
| James M. Raper, Jr. |
| Rose Braley, Head of Commissary, Keefe, Southwest Arkansas Community Correction Center |
| 23-2663 |
| July 18, 2023 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit |
| Prison Condition |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 15, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| APPEARANCE filed by Mark K. Cameron for Appellee Rose Braley w/service 09/15/2023 [5316736] [23-2663] (MKC) [Entered: 09/15/2023 11:38 AM] |
| BRIEF FILED - APPELLANT BRIEF filed with attachments by James M. Raper, Jr. w/service by USCA8 08/25/2023 , 5 copies of the brief. Length: 10 pages , The court has received and filed appellant's brief. Because no briefing schedule has been established, the appellant's brief is premature. Until a briefing schedule is established, no appellee responsive brief is due at this time. , [5310304] [23-2663]--[Edited 08/28/2023 by JJB] Added relief. (JJB) [Entered: 08/25/2023 01:59 PM] |
| MOTION for leave to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis w/attached affidavit, filed by Appellant James M. Raper, Jr. w/service 08/01/2023. [5301768] [23-2663] (AEV) [Entered: 08/01/2023 01:07 PM] |
| CLERK ORDER:If the original file of the United States District Court is available for review in electronic format, the court will rely on the electronic version of the record in its review. The appendices required by Eighth Circuit Rule 30A shall not be required. In accordance with Eighth Circuit Local Rule 30A(a)(2), the Clerk of the United States District Court is requested to forward to this Court forthwith any portions of the original record which are not available in an electronic format through PACER, including any documents maintained in paper format or filed under seal, exhibits, administrative records and state court files. These documents should be submitted within 10 days. [5297072] [23-2663] (AEV) [Entered: 07/18/2023 04:53 PM] |
| Originating court document filed consisting of notice of appeal, Report and Recommendation 4/11/23, Order 7/10/23, docket entries, [5297067] [23-2663] (AEV) [Entered: 07/18/2023 04:51 PM] |
| CLERK ORDER:The $505 appellate filing and docketing fee has not been paid and is due. Appellant is directed to either pay the fee in the district court or file a motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis in this court within 28 days of the date of this order. If appellant does not pay the fee or move for IFP status by 08/15/2023, this appeal may be dismissed for failure to prosecute without further notice. [5297070] [23-2663] (AEV) [Entered: 07/18/2023 04:52 PM] |
| Prisoner case docketed. [5297063] [23-2663] (AEV) [Entered: 07/18/2023 04:45 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: James Raper, Jr. v. Rose Braley | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff / appellant: James M. Raper, Jr. | |
| Represented By: | James M. Raper Jr. |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant / appellee: Rose Braley, Head of Commissary, Keefe, Southwest Arkansas Community Correction Center | |
| Represented By: | Mark Cameron |
| Represented By: | Mark Kelly Cameron |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
