William DeCory v. Darin Young, et al
Petitioner / Appellant: William Martin Ardene DeCory
Respondent / Appellee: Darin Young, Warden and Attorney General for the State of South Dakota
Case Number: 23-2722
Filed: July 27, 2023
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 1, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 1, 2023 JUDGMENT FILED - The district courts order denying petitioners motion for certificate of appealability and for subpoena and injunctive relief are summarily affirmed in accordance with Eighth Circuit Rule 47A. JAMES B. LOKEN, DUANE BENTON and L. STEVEN GRASZ Adp Aug 2023 [5312556] [23-2722] (RMD) [Entered: 09/01/2023 11:50 AM]
August 31, 2023 CASE SUBMITTED Ad Panel Submission before Judges James B. Loken, Duane Benton, L. Steven Grasz in St. Louis [5312549] [23-2722] (RMD) [Entered: 09/01/2023 11:36 AM]
August 23, 2023 Originating court document filed consisting of order dated 8/22/2023, the second order denying COA and motion for subpoena and injunctive relief. [5309347] [23-2722] (CBO) [Entered: 08/23/2023 02:49 PM]
July 27, 2023 CLERK ORDER: If the original file of the United States District Court is available for review in electronic format, the court will rely on the electronic version of the record in its review. The appendices required by Eighth Circuit Rule 30A shall not be required. In accordance with Eighth Circuit Local Rule 30A(a)(2), the Clerk of the United States District Court is requested to forward to this Court forthwith any portions of the original record which are not available in an electronic format through PACER, including any documents maintained in paper format or filed under seal, exhibits, administrative records and state court files. These documents should be submitted within 10 days. [5300338] [23-2722] (CBO) [Entered: 07/27/2023 12:41 PM]
July 27, 2023 Originating court document filed consisting of docket entries, Order Dismissing Petition filed 7/11/2019, Judgment filed 7/11/2019, Order Denying Motion to Reopen Case filed 1/5/2022, Notice of Appeal filed 7/12/2023, Order Denying COA and Granting IFP filed 7/17/2023, and Notice of Appeal refiled 7/26/2023. [5300334] [23-2722] (CBO) [Entered: 07/27/2023 12:36 PM]
July 27, 2023 Prisoner case docketed. [5300328] [23-2722] (CBO) [Entered: 07/27/2023 12:27 PM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: William DeCory v. Darin Young, et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner / appellant: William Martin Ardene DeCory
Represented By: William Martin Ardene DeCory
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent / appellee: Darin Young, Warden
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent / appellee: Attorney General for the State of South Dakota
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?