Joseph Engel v. Cybelle Webber
Petitioner / Appellant: Joseph Michael Devon Engel
Respondent / Appellee: Cybelle Webber
Case Number: 23-2908
Filed: August 23, 2023
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 12, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 12, 2023 JUDGMENT FILED - The motion to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis [ # 5312185-2 ] is denied. as moot. Application for Certificate of Appealability is denied. JAMES B. LOKEN, JANE KELLY and JONATHAN A. KOBES Adp Oct 2023 [5325699] [23-2908] (NDG) [Entered: 10/12/2023 04:12 PM]
October 11, 2023 CASE SUBMITTED Ad Panel Submission before Judges James B. Loken, Jane Kelly, Jonathan A. Kobes in St. Louis [5325697] [23-2908] (NDG) [Entered: 10/12/2023 04:09 PM]
September 11, 2023 INMATE ACCOUNT STATEMENT filed by Mr. Joseph Michael Devon Engel on 08/25/2023.[5314846] [23-2908] (CJO) [Entered: 09/11/2023 11:34 AM]
August 31, 2023 MOTION for leave to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis w/attached affidavit, filed by Party Mr. Joseph Michael Devon Engel, w/service 08/31/2023. [5312185] [23-2908] (CJO) [Entered: 08/31/2023 12:26 PM]
August 23, 2023 CLERK ORDER:If the original file of the United States District Court is available for review in electronic format, the court will rely on the electronic version of the record in its review. The appendices required by Eighth Circuit Rule 30A shall not be required. In accordance with Eighth Circuit Local Rule 30A(a)(2), the Clerk of the United States District Court is requested to forward to this Court forthwith any portions of the original record which are not available in an electronic format through PACER, including any documents maintained in paper format or filed under seal, exhibits, administrative records and state court files. These documents should be submitted within 10 days. [5309146] [23-2908] (CJO) [Entered: 08/23/2023 10:48 AM]
August 23, 2023 Originating court document filed consisting of notice of appeal, docket entries, Memorandum and Order 07/05/2023, Order of Dismissal 07/05/2023, and Order 08/21/2023. [5309137] [23-2908] (CJO) [Entered: 08/23/2023 10:42 AM]
August 23, 2023 CLERK ORDER:The $505 appellate filing and docketing fee has not been paid and is due. Appellant is directed to either pay the fee in the district court or file a motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis in this court within 28 days of the date of this order. If appellant does not pay the fee or move for IFP status by 09/20/2023, this appeal may be dismissed for failure to prosecute without further notice. [5309141] [23-2908] (CJO) [Entered: 08/23/2023 10:44 AM]
August 23, 2023 Prisoner case docketed. [5309131] [23-2908] (CJO) [Entered: 08/23/2023 10:39 AM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Joseph Engel v. Cybelle Webber
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner / appellant: Joseph Michael Devon Engel
Represented By: Joseph Michael Devon Engel
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent / appellee: Cybelle Webber
Represented By: Stephen David Hawke
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?