Roosevelt Cannady v. Larry Atkins, et al
| Roosevelt Cannady |
| Larry Joe Atkins, Candie Price, Annette Atkins, Conretta Atkins, City of Earle, Arkansas, Jonathan Atkins and Caretta Atkins |
| 23-2938 |
| August 25, 2023 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit |
| Other Fraud |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 20, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| MANDATE ISSUED. [5328012] [23-2938] (MTB) [Entered: 10/20/2023 09:47 AM] |
| PETITION for rehearing by panel filed by Appellant Mr. Roosevelt Cannady w/service by USCA8 10/18/2023 [5328031] [23-2938] (MTB) [Entered: 10/20/2023 10:19 AM] |
| DOCUMENT FILED - Request for Jury Trial filed by Mr. Roosevelt Cannady. w/service by USCA8 10/02/2023 [5322378] [23-2938] No action taken, crossed in the mail with judgment. (MTB) [Entered: 10/03/2023 02:03 PM] |
| JUDGMENT FILED - Granting [ # 5313438-2 ] motion to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis filed by Appellant Mr. Roosevelt Cannady., This case is summarily affirmed in accordance with Eighth Circuit Rule 47A. STEVEN M. COLLOTON, DUANE BENTON and JONATHAN A. KOBES Adp Sep 2023 [5321402] [23-2938] (MTB) [Entered: 09/29/2023 04:45 PM] |
| DOCUMENT FILED - copy of appellate case order issued on 8/25/2023 regarding payment of appellate docketing fee and two illegible copies of a receipt totaling $18.20 filed by Mr. Roosevelt Cannady. [5319578] [23-2938] (CMH) [Entered: 09/25/2023 03:44 PM] |
| CASE SUBMITTED Ad Panel Submission before Judges Steven M. Colloton, Duane Benton, Jonathan A. Kobes in St. Louis [5321399] [23-2938] (MTB) [Entered: 09/29/2023 04:40 PM] |
| DOCUMENT FILED - copies of miscellaneous documents that were filed in district court (including page 1 of order filed 8/18/2023 and page 7 of document filed on 8/25/2023), filed by w/service 09/11/2023. [5315039] [23-2938] (CMH) [Entered: 09/11/2023 03:30 PM] |
| MOTION for leave to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis w/attached affidavit, filed by Appellant Mr. Roosevelt Cannady w/service 09/06/2023. [5313438] [23-2938] (CMH) [Entered: 09/06/2023 10:55 AM] |
| DOCUMENT FILED - SSI payment statement for July 2020 filed by Mr. Roosevelt Cannady, w/service 09/06/2023. [5313444] [23-2938] (CMH) [Entered: 09/06/2023 10:59 AM] |
| Civil case docketed. [5310326] [23-2938] (CMH) [Entered: 08/25/2023 02:21 PM] |
| Originating court document filed consisting of notice of appeal, Order 8/18/2023, Judgment 8/18/2023, and docket entries. [5310332] [23-2938] (CMH) [Entered: 08/25/2023 02:25 PM] |
| CLERK ORDER: The $505 appellate filing and docketing fee has not been paid and is due. Appellant is directed to either pay the fee in the district court or file a motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis in this court within 28 days of the date of this order. If appellant does not pay the fee or move for IFP status by 09/22/2023, this appeal may be dismissed for failure to prosecute without further notice. [5310333] [23-2938] (CMH) [Entered: 08/25/2023 02:25 PM] |
| CLERK ORDER: If the original file of the United States District Court is available for review in electronic format, the court will rely on the electronic version of the record in its review. The appendices required by Eighth Circuit Rule 30A shall not be required. In accordance with Eighth Circuit Local Rule 30A(a)(2), the Clerk of the United States District Court is requested to forward to this Court forthwith any portions of the original record which are not available in an electronic format through PACER, including any documents maintained in paper format or filed under seal, exhibits, administrative records and state court files. These documents should be submitted within 10 days. [5310338] [23-2938] (CMH) [Entered: 08/25/2023 02:27 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
