Albert Millsapp v. MO DOC Employees, et al
| Albert Millsapp |
| Missouri Department of Corrections Employees, Lindsey Hill, Brittany Odom, Corrections Officer, Caleb Cross, Corrections Officer, Gerald Sobocinski, Corrections Officer, Frederick Wilson, Corrections Officer, Michael Graff, Corrections Officer, Jason R. Hess, Corrections Officer, Jeffrey Talent, Corrections Officer, Nightshift Sergeant, JCCC, Hanson or Hensley, JCCC, Brook Whittom, Nurse, Amira, Nurse, JCCC, Cheryl Galbreath, Nurse, Morgan, Nurse, JCCC, Aaron, Nurse, JCCC, Dentist, JCCC, Nurse Aid, JCCC, Anne L. Precythe, Director, Missouri Department of Corrections, Dental, Kempker, Caseworker, John Doe, Sergeant, Jenniffer, Nurse, Erin, Nurse and Denim, Corrections Officer |
| 23-2982 |
| August 31, 2023 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit |
| Prison Condition |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 16, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| JUDGMENT FILED - Appeal dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. The motion for appointment of counsel and the motion to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis are denied as moot. [ # 5325591-2 ] [ # 5325599-2 ] JAMES B. LOKEN, JANE KELLY and JONATHAN A. KOBES Adp Oct 2023 [5326339] [23-2982] (CRJ) [Entered: 10/16/2023 11:52 AM] |
| MEMORANDUM of Law in support of originating court document notice of appeal, Doc No. [ # 5312109-2 ], filed by Appellant Albert Millsapp w/service 10/12/2023. [5325586] [23-2982] (CJO) [Entered: 10/12/2023 02:34 PM] |
| MOTION for appointment of counsel, filed by Appellant Albert Millsapp, w/service 10/12/2023. [5325591] [23-2982] (CJO) [Entered: 10/12/2023 02:37 PM] |
| MOTION for leave to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis w/attached affidavit, filed by Party Albert Millsapp, w/service 10/12/2023. [5325599] [23-2982] (CJO) [Entered: 10/12/2023 02:40 PM] |
| LETTER from Appellant Albert Millsapp w/service 10/04/2023. [5322846] [23-2982] (CJO) [Entered: 10/04/2023 11:38 AM] |
| LETTER from Appellant Albert Millsapp requesting the form for filing a motion for leave to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis, w/service 09/25/2023. [5319575] [23-2982] (CJO) [Entered: 09/25/2023 03:43 PM] |
| CLERK ORDER:The $505 appellate filing and docketing fee has not been paid and is due. Appellant contacted the clerk's office, via letter, and advised that the in forma pauperis motion was not included with the fee order entered on 08/31/2023. Accordingly, on the court's own motion, appellant is granted an extension of time to either pay the fee in the district court or file a motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis in this court. If appellant does not pay the fee or move for IFP status by 10/12/2023, this appeal may be dismissed for failure to prosecute without further notice.[5319593] [23-2982] (CJO) [Entered: 09/25/2023 03:54 PM] |
| Prisoner case docketed. [5312102] [23-2982] (CJO) [Entered: 08/31/2023 11:05 AM] |
| Originating court document filed consisting of notice of appeal, docket entries, Order 06/22/2023, Judgment 06/22/2023, Docket Text Order 7/27/2023, and Order 08/30/2023. [5312109] [23-2982] (CJO) [Entered: 08/31/2023 11:16 AM] |
| CLERK ORDER:The $505 appellate filing and docketing fee has not been paid and is due. Appellant is directed to either pay the fee in the district court or file a motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis in this court within 28 days of the date of this order. If appellant does not pay the fee or move for IFP status by 09/28/2023, this appeal may be dismissed for failure to prosecute without further notice. [5312120] [23-2982] (CJO) [Entered: 08/31/2023 11:27 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
