Cardell Hunes v. Dexter Payne
| Cardell Hunes |
| Dexter Payne, Director, Arkansas Department of Correction |
| 23-3067 |
| September 12, 2023 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 12, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| MOTION for Permission to file a Successive Habeas Petition (Rec'd by MAIL), filed by Petitioner Mr. Cardell Hunes, w/service 09/12/2023. Response of Dexter Payne due 09/26/2023. [5315637] [23-3067] (CJO) [Entered: 09/12/2023 02:58 PM] |
| ORIGINAL PROCEEDING case docketed. [5315626] [23-3067] (CJO) [Entered: 09/12/2023 02:53 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Cardell Hunes v. Dexter Payne | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Cardell Hunes | |
| Represented By: | Cardell Hunes |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: Dexter Payne, Director, Arkansas Department of Correction | |
| Represented By: | Evangeline Bacon |
| Represented By: | Jason Michael Johnson |
| Represented By: | Jacob Helderman Jones |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
