Jarell Terry v. Kenyon Randle, et al
Plaintiff / Appellant: Jarell Davis Terry
Defendant / Appellee: Kenyon Randle, Major, EARU Max, Michael Richardson, Deputy Warden, EARU Max and Gaylon Lay, Warden, EARU
Case Number: 23-3153
Filed: September 25, 2023
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Prison Condition

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed Description
April 12, 2024 Jarell Terry v. Kenyon Randle

Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on November 6, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 6, 2023 BRIEF FILED - PRO SE APPELLANT BRIEF WITH ATTACHMENT filed by Mr. Jarell Davis Terry, w/service 11/06/2023. Length: 15 pages (Copies: 5). Brief of Gaylon Lay, Kenyon Randle and Michael Richardson due on 12/06/2023. [5333283] [23-3153] (HAG) [Entered: 11/06/2023 02:19 PM]
September 25, 2023 BRIEFING SCHEDULE SET AS FOLLOWS: If the original file of the U.S. District Court is available for review in electronic format, the court will rely on the electronic version of the record in its review. The appendices required by 8th Circuit Rule 30A shall not be required. In accordance with 8th Circuit Local Rule 30A (a)(2), the clerk of the United States District Court is requested to forward to this Court forthwith any portions of the original record which are not available in an electronic format or filed under seal, exhibits, administrative records and state court files. BRIEF OF APPELLANT Jarell Davis Terry due 11/06/2023. Appellee brief is due 30 days from the date the court issues the Notice of Docket Activity filing the brief of appellant. [5319550] [23-3153] (AEV) [Entered: 09/25/2023 03:23 PM]
September 25, 2023 Originating court document filed consisting of notice of appeal, Order 6/22/23, Judgment 6/22/23, Order 8/10/23, Order 9/25/23, docket entries, [5319541] [23-3153] (AEV) [Entered: 09/25/2023 03:19 PM]
September 25, 2023 Prisoner case docketed. [5319537] [23-3153] (AEV) [Entered: 09/25/2023 03:16 PM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Jarell Terry v. Kenyon Randle, et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellant: Jarell Davis Terry
Represented By: Jarell Davis Terry
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: Kenyon Randle, Major, EARU Max
Represented By: Britt Cannon Johnson
Represented By: Rosalyn Lynette Middleton
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: Michael Richardson, Deputy Warden, EARU Max
Represented By: Rosalyn Lynette Middleton
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: Gaylon Lay, Warden, EARU
Represented By: Rosalyn Lynette Middleton
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?