Travis Harvey v. United States
Petitioner: Travis Christopher Harvey
Respondent: United States of America
Case Number: 23-3172
Filed: September 27, 2023
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 27, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 27, 2023 MOTION for Permission to file a Successive Habeas Petition (Rec'd by MAIL), filed by Petitioner Mr. Travis Christopher Harvey w/service 09/27/2023. Response of United States of America due 10/11/2023. [5320530] [23-3172] (CMH) [Entered: 09/27/2023 04:28 PM]
September 27, 2023 ORIGINAL PROCEEDING case docketed. [5320511] [23-3172] (CMH) [Entered: 09/27/2023 04:02 PM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Travis Harvey v. United States
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Travis Christopher Harvey
Represented By: Travis Christopher Harvey
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: United States of America
Represented By: Gregory D. Artis Jr.
Represented By: Martin Conboy IV
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?