LADS Network Solutions, Inc. v. Agilis Systems, LLC, et al
LADS Network Solutions, Inc. |
Agilis Systems, LLC, Archlogix, LLC and Gilead Group, LLC |
23-3267 |
October 11, 2023 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit |
Copyright |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 15, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
CLERK ORDER:Granting [ # 5335641-2 ] motion for extension of time to file brief filed by Mr. Keith A. Rabenberg. Brief of LADS Network Solutions, Inc. due 12/21/2023. Appendix due on 12/21/2023. [5335809] [23-3267] (DNS) [Entered: 11/15/2023 08:14 AM] |
MOTION for extension of time to file brief until 12/21/2023, filed by Attorney Mr. Keith A. Rabenberg for Appellant LADS Network Solutions, Inc. w/service 11/14/2023. [5335641] [23-3267] (KAR) [Entered: 11/14/2023 02:30 PM] |
On December 1, 2016, the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure were amended to require a certificate of compliance for motions filed under [Rule 27], certifying that the document complies with the type-volume limitations and stating the number of words in the document. Your recently filed motion did not contain this certificate of compliance. No action will be taken on your motion for extension of time to file brief, [ # 5335641-2 ], submitted by Mr. Keith A. Rabenberg in 23-3267 , pending the filing of a certificate of compliance using the 'Certificate of Compliance' event. Please do not refile your motion [23-3267] (DNS) [Entered: 11/14/2023 04:09 PM] |
CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE filed by Attorney Mr. Keith A. Rabenberg for Appellant LADS Network Solutions, Inc. correcting [ # 5335641-2 ] motion for extension of time to file brief filed by Attorney. [5335787] [23-3267] (KAR) [Entered: 11/14/2023 05:18 PM] |
CORPORATE disclosure statement filed by Appellees Agilis Systems, LLC, Archlogix, LLC and Gilead Group, LLC. - FOR CAL [5328483] [23-3267] (BEM) [Entered: 10/23/2023 10:15 AM] |
APPEARANCE filed by Brian E. McGovern for Appellees Agilis Systems, LLC, Archlogix, LLC and Gilead Group, LLC w/service 10/20/2023 [5328208] [23-3267] (BEM) [Entered: 10/20/2023 02:09 PM] |
DESIGNATION of record and STATEMENT of issues filed by Appellant LADS Network Solutions, Inc. w/service 10/20/2023 [5328113] [23-3267]--[Edited 10/20/2023 by BNW to include statement of issues] (KAR) [Entered: 10/20/2023 11:46 AM] |
METHOD of appendix preparation filed by Appellant LADS Network Solutions, Inc. - Separate Appendix - w/service 10/20/2023 [5328109] [23-3267] (KAR) [Entered: 10/20/2023 11:45 AM] |
Certificate of transcript filed by Appellant LADS Network Solutions, Inc.. Transcript ordered Motion hearing held on 8/23/2021 and 8/25/2021 [5328105] [23-3267]--[Edited 10/20/2023 by BNW to show which transcripts were ordered.] (KAR) [Entered: 10/20/2023 11:43 AM] |
APPEARANCE filed by Keith A. Rabenberg for Appellant LADS Network Solutions, Inc. w/service 10/13/2023 [5325796] [23-3267] (KAR) [Entered: 10/13/2023 09:27 AM] |
CORPORATE disclosure statement filed by Appellant LADS Network Solutions, Inc.. - FOR CAL [5325801] [23-3267] (KAR) [Entered: 10/13/2023 09:29 AM] |
Originating court document filed consisting of notice of appeal, docket entries, Judgment 8/31/2021, Memorandum & ORder 9/14/2023, and Amended Judgment 9/14/2023. [5325159] [23-3267] (CMH) [Entered: 10/11/2023 03:51 PM] |
BRIEFING SCHEDULE SET AS FOLLOWS: Transcript due on or before 11/20/2023. Appendix due 11/30/2023. BRIEF APPELLANT, LADS Network Solutions, Inc. due 11/30/2023 Appellee brief is due 30 days from the date the court issues the Notice of Docket Activity filing the brief of appellant. [5325170] [23-3267] (CMH) [Entered: 10/11/2023 03:54 PM] |
Civil case docketed. [5325155] [23-3267] (CMH) [Entered: 10/11/2023 03:47 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.