Dustin Curtis v. State of Missouri, et al
Dustin Patrick Curtis |
State of Missouri, Aetna, et al., City of St. Charles, MO, United States of America, County of St. Charles, MO, United States of America Criminal Department of Criminal Justice, United States of America Eastern District Division Criminal Justice Department, United States District Court For The Eastern District of Missouri, Missouri Department of Probation and Parole, City of Wentzville, MO, Missouri Department of Criminal Justice Department, St. Louis County, MO, City of Sullivan, MO, Public Defender's Office, in the State of MO for St. Charles County, MO, Missouri Department of Health, and Mental Health, St. Charles County Correctional Center, Department of Corrections, St. Charles, MO, Missouri Department of Corrections, Medical Department of Corrections, Medical Department at St. Charles County Dept. of Corrections, The Company Who Provides/Saves the Illegal Spying Surveillance Body Cameras on Jailers at St. Charles County Correctional Center Dept. of Corrections, City of St. Peters, Missouri, Washington County, MO, Woodland Lakes, Washington County, MO, Budget Towing, in Wentzville, MO, Wentzville Police Department, Wentzville, MO, City of Maryland Heights, Missouri, President Joe Biden, City of Jefferson, County, MO, City of Potosi, MO, Washinigton County Courts, in Potosi, MO and Eathan Haworth, Sheriff of Washington County, MO |
23-3287 |
October 13, 2023 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit |
Prisoner - Civil Rights |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 9, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
UPDATED fee status - [Case Number 23-3287: due] [5334409] [23-3287] (CAH) [Entered: 11/09/2023 10:25 AM] |
CLERK ORDER:The district Court has determined that Appellant has three strikes under 28 U.S.C Section 1915(g). Accordingly, Appellant may not proceed in this appeal without first paying the full appellate docketing fee. Appellant is directed to pay to the district court the appellate docketing fee of $505, or to file a pleading in this court explaining why Appellant is eligible to proceed without pre-payment of the fee. If appellant fails to either pay the fee or respond to this order within 30 days of the date of this order, the appeal will be dismissed for failure to prosecute. Compliance is due 11/27/2023 [5330417] [23-3287] 12 11 (CAH) [Entered: 10/27/2023 10:54 AM] |
District court order of 10/17/2023 denying ifp, [5330416] [23-3287] (CAH) [Entered: 10/27/2023 10:53 AM] |
CLERK ORDER:If the original file of the United States District Court is available for review in electronic format, the court will rely on the electronic version of the record in its review. The appendices required by Eighth Circuit Rule 30A shall not be required. In accordance with Eighth Circuit Local Rule 30A(a)(2), the Clerk of the United States District Court is requested to forward to this Court forthwith any portions of the original record which are not available in an electronic format through PACER, including any documents maintained in paper format or filed under seal, exhibits, administrative records and state court files. These documents should be submitted within 10 days. [5325867] [23-3287] (CAH) [Entered: 10/13/2023 10:35 AM] |
Originating court document filed consisting of notice of appeal, docket entries. No order is being appealed. [5325865] [23-3287] (CAH) [Entered: 10/13/2023 10:35 AM] |
Prisoner case docketed. [5325862] [23-3287] (CAH) [Entered: 10/13/2023 10:29 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.