Jason Bethune v. SSA, et al
| Jason Lavet Bethune |
| Social Security Administration, Grand River Office, Mr. Barret, Ms. Meadows, Mr. Hasan and Ms. Hannah |
| 23-3324 |
| October 18, 2023 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit |
| Other Civil Rights |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 28, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| CLERK ORDER: APPELLANT has failed to pay to the Clerk of the District Court the requisite docketing fees. APPELLANT is directed to show cause within 14 days why these appeals should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute. Response of Jason Lavet Bethune due 12/12/2023 [5339004] [23-3307, 23-3308, 23-3309, 23-3310, 23-3312, 23-3314, 23-3315, 23-3317, 23-3324] (CBO) [Entered: 11/28/2023 08:58 AM] |
| CLERK ORDER: The $505 appellate filing and docketing fee has not been paid and is due. Appellant is directed to either pay the fee in the district court or file a motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis in this court within 28 days of the date of this order. If appellant does not pay the fee or move for IFP status by 11/15/2023, this appeal may be dismissed for failure to prosecute without further notice. [5327551] [23-3324] (CBO) [Entered: 10/18/2023 04:40 PM] |
| Originating court document filed consisting of docket entries, Order filed 1/20/2022, Judgment filed 1/20/2022, and Notice of Appeal filed 10/16/2023. [5327550] [23-3324] (CBO) [Entered: 10/18/2023 04:39 PM] |
| Civil case docketed. [5327481] [23-3307, 23-3308, 23-3309, 23-3310, 23-3312, 23-3314, 23-3315, 23-3317, 23-3324] (CBO) [Entered: 10/18/2023 03:23 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
