Thomas Sanderson v. Andrew Bailey, et al
Thomas L. Sanderson, an individual |
Andrew Bailey, in his official capacity as Attorney General of the State of Missouri and James Hudanick, in his official capacity as Chief of Police of the City of Hazelwood, Missouri |
23-3394 |
October 27, 2023 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit |
Constitutionality of State Statutes |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 11, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
JUDGMENT FILED - The motion to dismiss case filed by Mr. Andrew James Clarke and Mr. Timothy John Reichardt is granted [ # 5339168-2 ]. The case is dismissed in accordance with Rule 42(b), Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure. Mandate shall issue forthwith. [5343049] [23-3394] (BNW) [Entered: 12/11/2023 07:58 AM] |
MANDATE ISSUED. [5343053] [23-3394] (BNW) [Entered: 12/11/2023 08:06 AM] |
CLERK LETTER sent to hold briefing schedule in abeyance pending ruling on appellee's motion to dismiss. [5339163] [23-3394] (BNW) [Entered: 11/28/2023 10:57 AM] |
MOTION to dismiss case, filed by Attorney Mr. Andrew James Clarke for Appellant Andrew Bailey and Attorney Mr. Timothy John Reichardt for Appellant James Hudanick w/service 11/28/2023. [5339168] [23-3394]--[Edited 11/28/2023 by BNW to add appellant to docket text] (AJC) [Entered: 11/28/2023 11:07 AM] |
MOTION to dismiss case, or in the alternative, motion for stay of appeal, filed by Janice Bellucci for Appellee Thomas L. Sanderson w/service 11/27/2023. [5338909] [23-3394]--[Edited 11/28/2023 by BNW to correct relief and docket text.] (JB) [Entered: 11/27/2023 06:23 PM] |
REPLY to response [ # 5330791-2 ] filed by Appellants Andrew Bailey and James Hudanick w/service 10/30/2023. [5330992] [23-3394] (GMG) [Entered: 10/30/2023 01:46 PM] |
JUDGE ORDER: The appellants motion for permission to file an overlength emergency motion for stay has been referred to the court, and the motion is granted [ # 5330695-2 ]. Appellants emergency motion for a stay of the district courts temporary restraining order is denied [ # 5330696-2 ]. Adp Oct 2023 [5331069] [23-3394]-[Edited 10/30/2023 by DMW to correct relief/NDA subject line] (BNW) [Entered: 10/30/2023 03:16 PM] |
APPEARANCE filed by Timothy J. Reichardt for Appellant James Hudanick w/service 10/30/2023 [5330934] [23-3394] (TJR) [Entered: 10/30/2023 11:40 AM] |
RESPONSE in opposition to motion for stay [ # 5330696-2 ] filed by Attorney Janice Bellucci for Appellee Thomas L. Sanderson , w/service 10/30/2023. [5330791] [23-3394] (JB) [Entered: 10/30/2023 09:35 AM] |
APPEARANCE filed by Joshua M. Divine for Appellant Andrew Bailey w/service 10/27/2023 [5330675] [23-3394] (JD) [Entered: 10/27/2023 04:52 PM] |
BRIEFING SCHEDULE SET AS FOLLOWS: Appendix due on 12/06/2023. BRIEF OF APPELLANT Andrew Bailey due 12/06/2023. Appellee brief is due 30 days from the date the court issues the Notice of Docket Activity filing the brief of appellant. [5330662] [23-3394] (CAH) [Entered: 10/27/2023 04:28 PM] |
Originating court document filed consisting of notice of appeal, docket entries, memorandum & order 10/27/23. [5330661] [23-3394] (CAH) [Entered: 10/27/2023 04:27 PM] |
MOTION to file an overlength motion for stay, filed by Attorney Mr. Gregory Michael Goodwin for Appellant Andrew Bailey and James Hudanick, w/service 10/27/2023.--[Edited 10/27/2023 by EDG to edit description of overlength pleading and party filer] [5330695] [23-3394] (GMG) [Entered: 10/27/2023 07:06 PM] |
MOTION for stay, filed by Attorney Mr. Gregory Michael Goodwin for Appellant Andrew Bailey and James Hudanick--[Edited 10/27/2023 by EDG to include Hudanick as second party filer] w/service 10/27/2023. [5330696] [23-3394] (GMG) [Entered: 10/27/2023 07:08 PM] |
CLERK LETTER sent regarding new caption in case. Appellant Hudanick was added pursuant to the filing of the Amended Notice of Appeal. [5330706] [23-3394] (EDG) [Entered: 10/27/2023 08:52 PM] |
Originating court document filed consisting of amended notice of appeal. [5330701] [23-3394] (EDG) [Entered: 10/27/2023 08:24 PM] |
Civil case docketed. [5330658] [23-3394] (CAH) [Entered: 10/27/2023 04:25 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Search for this case: Thomas Sanderson v. Andrew Bailey, et al | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff / appellee: Thomas L. Sanderson, an individual | |
Represented By: | Janice Bellucci |
Represented By: | Matthew Fry |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant / appellant: Andrew Bailey, in his official capacity as Attorney General of the State of Missouri | |
Represented By: | Andrew James Clarke |
Represented By: | Joshua Divine |
Represented By: | Gregory Michael Goodwin |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant / appellant: James Hudanick, in his official capacity as Chief of Police of the City of Hazelwood, Missouri | |
Represented By: | Daniel Mooney |
Represented By: | Timothy John Reichardt |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.