Roderick Rankin v. Dexter Payne
Roderick Leshun Rankin |
Dexter Payne, Director, Arkansas Department of Correction (originally named as Ray Hobbs) |
23-3526 |
November 16, 2023 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit |
Death Penalty |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 18, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
CLERK ORDER:Granting in Part [ # 5345141-2 ] motion for extension of time to file brief filed by Mr. Joseph Luby [5345490] Brief of Roderick Leshun Rankin due 02/05/2024. Appendix due on 02/05/2024 [5345490] [23-3526] (RMD) [Entered: 12/18/2023 02:13 PM] |
MOTION for extension of time to file brief until 03/05/2024, filed by Attorney Mr. Joseph Luby for Appellant Mr. Roderick Leshun Rankin w/service 12/15/2023. [5345141] [23-3526] (JL) [Entered: 12/15/2023 03:44 PM] |
APPEARANCE filed by Joseph W. Luby for Appellant Mr. Roderick Leshun Rankin w/service 11/28/2023 [5339371] [23-3526] (JL) [Entered: 11/28/2023 02:49 PM] |
METHOD of appendix preparation filed by Appellant Mr. Roderick Leshun Rankin - Separate Appendix - w/service 11/28/2023 [5339470] [23-3526] (JL) [Entered: 11/28/2023 04:05 PM] |
CLERK ORDER:Granting [ # 5336679-2 ] motion to withdraw as counsel filed by Mr. Chris R. Warthen. Mr. Adam Donner Jackson for Dexter Payne has been granted leave to withdraw from this case. [5337826] [23-3526] (NDG) [Entered: 11/21/2023 03:05 PM] |
CORRECTED/INITIAL certificate of service for motion to withdraw as counsel, Doc No. [ # 5336679-2 ], filed by Appellee Dexter Payne [5336972] [23-3526] (CRW) [Entered: 11/20/2023 08:57 AM] |
MOTION to withdraw as appointed counsel, filed by Attorney Mr. Chris R. Warthen for Appellee Dexter Payne w/service 11/17/2023. [5336679] [23-3526] (CRW) [Entered: 11/17/2023 09:58 AM] |
Originating court document filed consisting of notice of appeal, docket entries, order 6/14/22, order 2/22/23, judgment 2/23/23, order 6/20/23, order 11/16/23. [5336500] [23-3526] (CAH) [Entered: 11/16/2023 03:18 PM] |
BRIEFING SCHEDULE SET AS FOLLOWS: Transcript due on or before 12/26/2023. Appendix due 01/05/2024. BRIEF APPELLANT, Roderick Leshun Rankin due 01/05/2024 Appellee brief is due 30 days from the date the court issues the Notice of Docket Activity filing the brief of appellant. [5336502] [23-3526] (CAH) [Entered: 11/16/2023 03:19 PM] |
Death Penalty case docketed. [23-3526] (CAH) [Entered: 11/16/2023 02:52 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Search for this case: Roderick Rankin v. Dexter Payne | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff / appellant: Roderick Leshun Rankin | |
Represented By: | Aren Adjoian |
Represented By: | Cristi Charpentier |
Represented By: | Roderick Leshun Rankin |
Represented By: | Joseph Luby |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant / appellee: Dexter Payne, Director, Arkansas Department of Correction (originally named as Ray Hobbs) | |
Represented By: | Brooke Jackson Gasaway |
Represented By: | Adam Donner Jackson |
Represented By: | Darnisa E. Johnson |
Represented By: | Chris R. Warthen |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.