Matthew Miller v. Billy Busch, Jr.
Matthew W. Miller |
Billy Busch, Jr. |
23-3616 |
November 30, 2023 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit |
Racketeer Influenced & Corrupt Og |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 9, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
PETITION for rehearing by panel filed by Appellant Matthew W. Miller 01/09/2024 [5351893] [23-3616] (RMD) [Entered: 01/09/2024 04:12 PM] |
JUDGMENT FILED - Granting [ # 5342976-2 ] motion to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis filed by Appellant Matthew W. Miller., This case is summarily affirmed in accordance with Eighth Circuit Rule 47A. JAMES B. LOKEN, RAYMOND W. GRUENDER and JANE KELLY Adp Dec 2023 [5347983] [23-3616] (DNS) [Entered: 12/27/2023 08:05 AM] |
CASE SUBMITTED Ad Panel Submission before Judges James B. Loken, Raymond W. Gruender, Jane Kelly in St. Louis [5347981] [23-3616] (DNS) [Entered: 12/27/2023 08:00 AM] |
MOTION for leave to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis w/attached affidavit, filed by Appellant Matthew W. Miller w/service 12/08/2023. [5342976] [23-3616] (RDB) [Entered: 12/08/2023 03:33 PM] |
UPDATED fee status - [Case Number 23-3616: due] [5341909] [23-3616] (RDB) [Entered: 12/06/2023 08:46 AM] |
Originating court document filed consisting of notice of appeal, docket entries, Opinion dated 11/14/2023, Order of Dismissal dated 11/14/2023 [5341137] [23-3616] (RDB) [Entered: 12/04/2023 11:32 AM] |
CLERK ORDER:If the original file of the United States District Court is available for review in electronic format, the court will rely on the electronic version of the record in its review. The appendices required by Eighth Circuit Rule 30A shall not be required. In accordance with Eighth Circuit Local Rule 30A(a)(2), the Clerk of the United States District Court is requested to forward to this Court forthwith any portions of the original record which are not available in an electronic format through PACER, including any documents maintained in paper format or filed under seal, exhibits, administrative records and state court files. These documents should be submitted within 10 days. [5341149] [23-3616] (RDB) [Entered: 12/04/2023 11:37 AM] |
CLERK ORDER:The $505 appellate filing and docketing fee has not been paid and is due. Appellant is directed to either pay the fee in the district court or file a motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis in this court within 28 days of the date of this order. If appellant does not pay the fee or move for IFP status by 01/02/2024, this appeal may be dismissed for failure to prosecute without further notice. [5341154] [23-3616] (RDB) [Entered: 12/04/2023 11:41 AM] |
Civil case docketed. [5341130] [23-3616] (RDB) [Entered: 12/04/2023 11:26 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Search for this case: Matthew Miller v. Billy Busch, Jr. | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff / appellant: Matthew W. Miller | |
Represented By: | Matthew W. Miller |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant / appellee: Billy Busch, Jr. | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.