Darrel Fisher v. Brian Casey
Darrel R. Fisher |
Brian Patrick Casey |
23-3636 |
December 1, 2023 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit |
Prisoner - Civil Rights |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 23, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
JUDGMENT FILED - Granting [ # 5349541-2 ] motion to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis filed by Appellant Mr. Darrel R. Fisher., This case is summarily affirmed in accordance with Eighth Circuit Rule 47A. DUANE BENTON, RALPH R. ERICKSON and DAVID R. STRAS Adp Jan 2024 [5355961] [23-3636] (MTB) [Entered: 01/23/2024 02:21 PM] |
CASE SUBMITTED Ad Panel Submission before Judges Duane Benton, Ralph R. Erickson, David R. Stras in St. Louis [5355959] [23-3636] (MTB) [Entered: 01/23/2024 02:20 PM] |
MOTION for leave to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis w/attached affidavit, filed by Appellant Mr. Darrel R. Fisher. [5349541] [23-3636] (AEV) [Entered: 01/02/2024 02:45 PM] |
CLERK ORDER:If the original file of the United States District Court is available for review in electronic format, the court will rely on the electronic version of the record in its review. The appendices required by Eighth Circuit Rule 30A shall not be required. In accordance with Eighth Circuit Local Rule 30A(a)(2), the Clerk of the United States District Court is requested to forward to this Court forthwith any portions of the original record which are not available in an electronic format through PACER, including any documents maintained in paper format or filed under seal, exhibits, administrative records and state court files. These documents should be submitted within 10 days. [5342582] [23-3636] (AEV) [Entered: 12/07/2023 02:23 PM] |
JUDGE ORDER:The appellate filing and docketing fee has not been paid and is due. Applying the prison mailbox rule, the applicable appellate filing and docketing fee for this appeal is $505. Appellant is directed to either pay the fee in the district court or file a motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis in this court within 28 days of this order. If appellant does not pay the fee or move for IFP status by 01/04/2024, this appeal may be dismissed for failure to prosecute without further notice. Adp Dec 2023 [5342579] [23-3636]--[Edited 12/07/2023 by AEV- to correct docket text] (AEV) [Entered: 12/07/2023 02:19 PM] |
CLERK LETTER sent noting that upon further review the appellate fee is due in this matter. An order will be issued setting out your options for satisfying the Eighth Circuit fee. [5342553] [23-3636] (AEV) [Entered: 12/07/2023 01:32 PM] |
Originating court document filed consisting of notice of appeal, Order Dismissing Case 10/13/23, Judgment 10/13/23, Order 12/1/23, docket entries, [5340937] [23-3636] (AEV) [Entered: 12/01/2023 04:15 PM] |
Prisoner case docketed. [5340933] [23-3636] (AEV) [Entered: 12/01/2023 04:11 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Search for this case: Darrel Fisher v. Brian Casey | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff / appellant: Darrel R. Fisher | |
Represented By: | Darrel R. Fisher |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant / appellee: Brian Patrick Casey | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.