Gary Sheldon v. United States
Petitioner / Appellant: Gary Thomas Sheldon
Respondent / Appellee: United States of America
Case Number: 23-3656
Filed: December 6, 2023
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Vacate Sentence
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on January 23, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
January 23, 2024 Originating court document filed consisting of originating court order of 01/23/2024 Denying COA, [5356025] [23-3656] (AEV) [Entered: 01/23/2024 03:22 PM]
January 23, 2024 MOTION for leave to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis w/attached affidavit, filed by Appellant Gary Thomas Sheldon w/service 01/23/2024. [5355829] [23-3656] (AEV) [Entered: 01/23/2024 12:07 PM]
December 28, 2023 CLERK ORDER On the Court's own motion, appellant is granted an extension of time to resolve the filing fee. A completed motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis must include an Application to Proceed Without Prepaying Fees or Costs or an affidavit that shows in the same detail your inability to pay or to give security for fees and costs. Compliance due 1/23/24. [5348386] [23-3656] (AEV) [Entered: 12/28/2023 08:51 AM]
December 26, 2023 MOTION for leave to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis (Incomplete). [5348380] [23-3656] (AEV) [Entered: 12/28/2023 08:47 AM]
December 11, 2023 CORRECTED CLERK ORDER: Upon further review, the $505 appellate filing and docketing fee has not been paid and is due. Appellant is directed to either pay the fee in the district court or file a motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis in this court within 28 days of the date of this order. If appellant does not pay the fee or move for IFP status by 01/08/2024, this appeal may be dismissed for failure to prosecute without further notice. [5343306] [23-3656] (AEV) [Entered: 12/11/2023 02:45 PM]
December 11, 2023 CORRECTED CLERK ORDER: Upon further review, the $505 appellate filing and docketing fee has not been paid and is due. Appellant is directed to either pay the fee in the district court or file a motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis in this court within 28 days of the date of this order. If appellant does not pay the fee or move for IFP status by 01/03/2024, this appeal may be dismissed for failure to prosecute without further notice. [5343277] [23-3656]--[Edited 12/11/2023 by AEV- locked and ddl corrected] (AEV) [Entered: 12/11/2023 02:09 PM]
December 7, 2023 APPEARANCE filed by Ami Harshad Miller for Appellee United States of America w/service 12/07/2023 [5342310] [23-3656] (AHM) [Entered: 12/07/2023 08:19 AM]
December 6, 2023 UPDATED fee status - [Case Number 23-3656: due] [5342208] - Sheldon lost IFP in his 2255 prior case no. 22-3420. [23-3656] (AEV) [Entered: 12/06/2023 03:32 PM]
December 6, 2023 Prisoner case docketed. [5342264] [23-3656] (AEV) [Entered: 12/06/2023 04:30 PM]
December 6, 2023 Originating court document filed consisting of notice of appeal, Report and Recommendation 11/9/15, Acceptance of Plea 11/30/15, Judgment 4/7/16, Order 1/9/23, Order 11/14/23, docket entries, [5342242] [23-3656] (AEV) [Entered: 12/06/2023 03:53 PM]
December 6, 2023 CLERK ORDER:The $605 appellate filing and docketing fee has not been paid and is due. Appellant is directed to either pay the fee in the district court or file a motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis in this court within 28 days of the date of this order. If appellant does not pay the fee or move for IFP status by 01/03/2024, this appeal may be dismissed for failure to prosecute without further notice. [5342265] [23-3656] (AEV) [Entered: 12/06/2023 04:34 PM]
December 6, 2023 CLERK ORDER:for limited remand. This case is remanded to the district court for a determination of whether to issue a certificate of appealability, with directions that, if granted, the COA specify the issue or issues that are to be considered on appeal. See 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2253; Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 22(b); United States v. Lambros, 404 F.3d 1034 (8th Cir. 2005);Tiedeman v. Benson, 122 F.3d (8th Cir. 1997) [5342266] [23-3656] (AEV) [Entered: 12/06/2023 04:36 PM]
December 6, 2023 CLERK ORDER:If the original file of the United States District Court is available for review in electronic format, the court will rely on the electronic version of the record in its review. The appendices required by Eighth Circuit Rule 30A shall not be required. In accordance with Eighth Circuit Local Rule 30A(a)(2), the Clerk of the United States District Court is requested to forward to this Court forthwith any portions of the original record which are not available in an electronic format through PACER, including any documents maintained in paper format or filed under seal, exhibits, administrative records and state court files. These documents should be submitted within 10 days. [5342268] [23-3656] (AEV) [Entered: 12/06/2023 04:37 PM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Gary Sheldon v. United States
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner / appellant: Gary Thomas Sheldon
Represented By: Gary Thomas Sheldon
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent / appellee: United States of America
Represented By: Ami Harshad Patel Miller
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?