Sr. Kate Reid, et al v. Doe Run Resources Corporation, et al
The Doe Run Resources Corporation, a New York Corporation, D. R. Acquisition Corp., a Missouri Corporation, Albert Bruce Neil, Jeffrey L. Zelms, The Renco Group, Inc., Ira L. Rennert, Doe Run Cayman Holdings LLC, a Missouri limited liability company and Marvin K. Kaiser |
Sr. Kate Reid, Megan Heeney, as next friends of, A. O. A., Meylith A. Caso Arroyo, Y. C. A., A. C. C., D. R. G., J. R. G., S. A. L., Jean P. Quispe Morales and B. Q. M. |
23-8001 |
January 30, 2023 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit |
Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 2, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
REPLY to response [ # 5248658-2 ] filed by Interested Partys Missouri Chamber of Commerce and Industry and The Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America w/service 03/02/2023. [5250849] [23-8001] (PNS) [Entered: 03/02/2023 10:08 AM] |
RESPONSE in opposition to motion leave to file amicus brief [ # 5245054-2 ], filed by Attorney Mr. Nathan Stump for Respondents A. C. C., A. O. A., Meylith A. Caso Arroyo, B. Q. M., D. R. G., Ms. Megan Heeney, J. R. G., Jean P. Quispe Morales, Sr. Kate Reid, S. A. L. and Y. C. A. , w/service 02/23/2023. [5248658] [23-8001] (NS) [Entered: 02/23/2023 05:49 PM] |
CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE filed by Attorney Mr. Patrick N. Strawbridge for Interested Partys Missouri Chamber of Commerce and Industry and The Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America correcting [ # 5245054-2 ] motion. [5245295] [23-8001] (PNS) [Entered: 02/13/2023 12:21 PM] |
CLERK ORDER:Parties are notified that absent the filing of a formal objection within10 days, the motion of Chamber of Commerce of the U.S. and the Missouri Chamber of Commerce and Industry for leave to participate as amicus curiae in support of petitioners will be deemed as granted. [5245228] [23-8001] (CAH) [Entered: 02/13/2023 10:26 AM] |
On December 1, 2016, the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure were amended to require a certificate of compliance for motions/petitions filed under [Rule 27/Rule 5/Rule 21/Rule 35/Rule 40], certifying that the document complies with the type-volume limitations and stating the number of words in the document. Although your tendered amici brief contains a certification of compliance, your motion for leave to file an amicus brief does not. No action will be taken on your motion leave to file amicus brief, [ # 5245054-2 ], , pending the filing of a certificate of compliance using the 'Certificate of Compliance' event. Please do not refile your entire motion [23-8001] (CAH) [Entered: 02/13/2023 10:21 AM] |
MOTION interested party, Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America and Missouri Chamber of Commerce and Industry , for leave to file amicus curiae brief on behalf of Defendants-Petitioners. w/service 02/10/2023. [5245054] [23-8001] (PNS) [Entered: 02/10/2023 04:23 PM] |
RESPONSE in opposition to petition [ # 5240818-2 ] filed by Attorney Mr. Nathan Stump for Respondents A. C. C., A. O. A., Meylith A. Caso Arroyo, B. Q. M., D. R. G., Ms. Megan Heeney, J. R. G., Jean P. Quispe Morales, Sr. Kate Reid, S. A. L. and Y. C. A. , w/service 02/09/2023. [5244515] [23-8001] (NS) [Entered: 02/09/2023 04:28 PM] |
PETITION for Permission to Appeal pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 1292(b). (Electronic) filed by Petitioners D. R. Acquisition Corp., Doe Run Cayman Holdings LLC, Doe Run Resources Corporation, Mr. Marvin K. Kaiser, Mr. Albert Bruce Neil, Mr. Ira L. Rennert, The Renco Group and Mr. Jeffrey L. Zelms w/service 01/31/2023 [5240818] [23-8001] (CAH) [Entered: 01/31/2023 12:07 PM] |
Miscellaneous case docketed. [5240811] [23-8001] (CAH) [Entered: 01/31/2023 12:02 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.