Sutter & Gillham PLLC, et al v. Judy Henry, et al
| Sutter & Gillham PLLC, Luther Oneal Sutter and Lucien R. Gillham |
| Judy Simmons Henry, Jacob Post Fair, Scott A. Irby, Wright Lindsey Jennings LLP, Tommy Williams, Bryan Adams, Eric Bell, Brandon Adams, Skylar Adams, Efrem Neely, Christopher Wesley Burks, Brandon M. Haubert, WH Law PLC and John Does 1-100 |
| 24-1071 |
| January 12, 2024 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit |
| Other Civil Rights |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 21, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| CLERK ORDER:Granting [ # 5365278-2 ] motion for extension of time to file brief filed by Luther Oneal Sutter and Lucien R. Gillham. Brief of Lucien R. Gillham, Luther Oneal Sutter and Sutter & Gillham PLLC due 03/22/2024. Appendix due on 03/22/2024. [5365350] [24-1071] (CRJ) [Entered: 02/21/2024 09:30 AM] |
| MOTION for extension of time to file brief until 03/22/2024, filed by Lucien R. Gillham for Appellants Lucien R. Gillham, Sutter & Gillham PLLC and Luther Oneal Sutter and Luther Oneal Sutter for Appellants Lucien R. Gillham, Sutter & Gillham PLLC and Luther Oneal Sutter w/service 02/21/2024. [5365278] [24-1071] (LRG) [Entered: 02/21/2024 08:36 AM] |
| UPDATED fee status - [Case Number 24-1071: paid - cs] [5355631] [24-1071] (RDB) [Entered: 01/23/2024 09:29 AM] |
| APPEARANCE filed by Judy S. Henry for Appellees Brandon Adams, Bryan Adams, Skylar Adams, Eric Bell, Jacob Post Fair, Judy Simmons Henry, Scott A. Irby and Wright Lindsey Jennings LLP w/service 01/22/2024 [5355358] [24-1071] (JSH) [Entered: 01/22/2024 10:51 AM] |
| APPEARANCE filed by Peter Shults for Appellee Efrem Neely w/service 01/19/2024 [5355087] [24-1071] (PS) [Entered: 01/19/2024 02:49 PM] |
| APPEARANCE filed by Steven Shults for Appellee Efrem Neely w/service 01/19/2024 [5355090] [24-1071] (SS) [Entered: 01/19/2024 02:52 PM] |
| APPEARANCE filed by Lucien R. Gillham for Appellants Lucien R. Gillham, Luther Oneal Sutter and Sutter & Gillham PLLC w/service 01/19/2024 [5355025] [24-1071]--[Edited 01/19/2024 by CRJ. Entry edited to include all appellants] (LOS) [Entered: 01/19/2024 02:08 PM] |
| APPEARANCE filed by Luther O. Sutter for Appellants Lucien R. Gillham, Luther Oneal Sutter and Sutter & Gillham PLLC w/service 01/19/2024 [5355018] [24-1071]--[Edited 01/19/2024 by CRJ. Entry edited to include all appellants] (LOS) [Entered: 01/19/2024 02:03 PM] |
| APPEARANCE filed by Adam D. Franks for Appellees Christopher Wesley Burks, Brandon M. Haubert and WH Law PLC w/service 01/19/2024 [5354943] [24-1071] (ADF) [Entered: 01/19/2024 11:54 AM] |
| CORPORATE disclosure statement filed by Appellee WH Law PLC. - FOR CAL [5354941] [24-1071] (ADF) [Entered: 01/19/2024 11:51 AM] |
| APPEARANCE filed by Jerry D. Garner for Appellees Christopher Wesley Burks, Brandon M. Haubert and WH Law PLC w/service 01/19/2024 [5354948] [24-1071] (JDG) [Entered: 01/19/2024 12:03 PM] |
| APPEARANCE filed by David M. Donovan for Appellee Tommy Williams w/service 01/17/2024 [5354260] [24-1071] (DMD) [Entered: 01/17/2024 03:26 PM] |
| Originating court document filed consisting of notice of appeal, docket entries, Order dated 12/15/2023, Judgment dated 12/15/2023 [5353219] [24-1071] (RDB) [Entered: 01/12/2024 03:28 PM] |
| BRIEFING SCHEDULE SET AS FOLLOWS: Appendix due on 02/21/2024. BRIEF OF APPELLANT Lucien R. Gillham, Luther Oneal Sutter and Sutter & Gillham PLLC due 02/21/2024. Appellee brief is due 30 days from the date the court issues the Notice of Docket Activity filing the brief of appellant. [5353221] [24-1071] (RDB) [Entered: 01/12/2024 03:29 PM] |
| Civil case docketed. [5353213] [24-1071] (RDB) [Entered: 01/12/2024 03:24 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
