Cody Howard v. Does
| Cody S. Howard |
| Does, Classification Personnel, Administrative Personnel, Pulaski County Regional Detention Facility |
| 24-1079 |
| January 16, 2024 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit |
| Prison Condition |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 22, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| RESPONSE in opposition to clerk order pay full filing fee [ # 5353542-2 ],clerk order [ # 5353542-3 ] filed by Party Cody S. Howard , w/service 02/22/2024. [5366365] [24-1079] (AEV) [Entered: 02/22/2024 04:18 PM] |
| MOTION for leave to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis w/attached affidavit, filed by Appellant Cody S. Howard w/service 02/15/2024. [5364014] [24-1079] (AEV) [Entered: 02/15/2024 01:33 PM] |
| MEMORANDUM of Appellant Cody S. Howard in support of originating court document notice of appeal titled, "Objection", Doc No. [ # 5353533-2 ]. w/service 01/31/2024. [5358965] [24-1079] (AEV) [Entered: 01/31/2024 02:07 PM] |
| CLERK ORDER:If the original file of the United States District Court is available for review in electronic format, the court will rely on the electronic version of the record in its review. The appendices required by Eighth Circuit Rule 30A shall not be required. In accordance with Eighth Circuit Local Rule 30A(a)(2), the Clerk of the United States District Court is requested to forward to this Court forthwith any portions of the original record which are not available in an electronic format through PACER, including any documents maintained in paper format or filed under seal, exhibits, administrative records and state court files. These documents should be submitted within 10 days. [5353546] [24-1079] (AEV) [Entered: 01/16/2024 11:53 AM] |
| Originating court document filed consisting of notice of appeal, Order 10/16/23, Addendum to NOA 10/25/23, Order 1/12/24, docket entries, [5353533] [24-1079] (AEV) [Entered: 01/16/2024 11:46 AM] |
| CLERK ORDER:The district Court has determined that Appellant has three strikes under 28 U.S.C Section 1915(g). Accordingly, Appellant may not proceed in this appeal without first paying the full appellate docketing fee. Appellant is directed to pay to the district court the appellate docketing fee of $505, or to file a pleading in this court explaining why Appellant is eligible to proceed without pre-payment of the fee. If appellant fails to either pay the fee or respond to this order within 30 days of the date of this order, the appeal will be dismissed for failure to prosecute. Compliance is due February 15, 2024. [5353542] [24-1079]---[Edited 01/22/2024 by AEV to include compliance date] (AEV) [Entered: 01/16/2024 11:49 AM] |
| Prisoner case docketed. [5353526] [24-1079] (AEV) [Entered: 01/16/2024 11:41 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Cody Howard v. Does | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Cody S. Howard | |
| Represented By: | Cody S. Howard |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Does, Classification Personnel, Administrative Personnel, Pulaski County Regional Detention Facility | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
