Kristopher Roybal v. Paul Schnell
Petitioner: Kristopher Lee Roybal
Respondent: Paul Schnell, Commissioner of Corrections
Case Number: 24-1146
Filed: January 26, 2024
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 12, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
March 12, 2024 CLERK LETTER sent regarding status of case. [5372752] [24-1146] (CBO) [Entered: 03/12/2024 04:00 PM]
March 11, 2024 LETTER from Appellant Kristopher Lee Roybal regarding status of case. Filed w/service 03/11/2024. [5372750] [24-1146] (CBO) [Entered: 03/12/2024 03:54 PM]
February 26, 2024 UPDATED fee status - [Case Number 24-1146: In Forma Pauperis] [5367444] [24-1146] (CBO) [Entered: 02/26/2024 04:03 PM]
February 26, 2024 Originating court document filed consisting of order dated 02/25/2024 granting motion to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis. [5367443] [24-1146] (CBO) [Entered: 02/26/2024 04:02 PM]
January 26, 2024 CLERK ORDER: If the original file of the United States District Court is available for review in electronic format, the court will rely on the electronic version of the record in its review. The appendices required by Eighth Circuit Rule 30A shall not be required. In accordance with Eighth Circuit Local Rule 30A(a)(2), the Clerk of the United States District Court is requested to forward to this Court forthwith any portions of the original record which are not available in an electronic format through PACER, including any documents maintained in paper format or filed under seal, exhibits, administrative records and state court files. These documents should be submitted within 10 days. [5357232] [24-1146] (CBO) [Entered: 01/26/2024 11:53 AM]
January 26, 2024 Originating court document filed consisting of docket entries, Report and Recommendation filed 4/29/2022, Order Adopting R&R filed 7/8/2022, Report and Recommendation filed 8/22/2023, Order Adopting R&R filed 12/21/2023, and Notice of Appeal filed 1/25/2024. [5357225] [24-1146] (CBO) [Entered: 01/26/2024 11:49 AM]
January 26, 2024 CLERK ORDER: The $605 appellate filing and docketing fee has not been paid and is due. Appellant is directed to either pay the fee in the district court or file a motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis in the district court within 21 days of the date of this order. If appellant does not pay the fee or move for IFP status by 02/16/2024, a show cause order will be entered directing the appellant to show cause why this appeal should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute. [5357228] [24-1146] (CBO) [Entered: 01/26/2024 11:51 AM]
January 26, 2024 Prisoner case docketed. [5357220] [24-1146] (CBO) [Entered: 01/26/2024 11:44 AM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Kristopher Roybal v. Paul Schnell
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Kristopher Lee Roybal
Represented By: Kristopher Lee Roybal
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Paul Schnell, Commissioner of Corrections
Represented By: Benjamin Thomas Lindstrom
Represented By: Edwin William Stockmeyer III
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?