James Johnson v. USPS
James M. Johnson |
United States Postal Service |
24-1381 |
February 23, 2024 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit |
Jobs |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 18, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Addendum deficiency notice sent to counsel, Attorney William Robert Pointer, II for Appellant James M. Johnson. New electronic copy of addendum due on 04/23/2024 [5384712] [24-1381] (CRJ) [Entered: 04/18/2024 10:11 AM] |
Brief deficiency notice sent to counsel, Attorney William Robert Pointer, II for Appellant James M. Johnson. [5384700] [24-1381] (CRJ) [Entered: 04/18/2024 10:02 AM] |
APPELLANT brief of James M. Johnson submitted for review. The time for filing the subsequent brief (if any) does not begin to run until the brief has been approved and filed. To open/view this brief, you must first login to CM/ECF and then open the document link in your Notice of Docket Activity. Only direct recipients on accounts can open this document. [5384566] [24-1381] (WRP) [Entered: 04/17/2024 08:05 PM] |
***DOCUMENT LOCKED***Addendum of APPELLANT submitted for review by James M. Johnson. To open/view this addendum, you must first login to CM/ECF and then open the document link in your Notice of Docket Activity. [5384567] [24-1381]--[Edited 04/18/2024 by CRJ. Counsel has submitted the appendix as an addendum.] (WRP) [Entered: 04/17/2024 08:07 PM] |
CLERK ORDER: Granting [ # 5378311-2 ] motion for extension of time to file brief filed by William Robert Pointer, II. Brief of James M. Johnson due 04/17/2024. Appendix due on 04/17/2024. [5378464] [24-1381] (HAG) [Entered: 03/29/2024 08:21 AM] |
MOTION for extension of time to file brief until 04/17/2024, filed by Attorney William Robert Pointer, II for Appellant James M. Johnson w/service 03/28/2024. [5378311] [24-1381] (WRP) [Entered: 03/28/2024 03:38 PM] |
APPEARANCE filed by William R. Pointer for Appellant James M. Johnson w/service 03/15/2024 [5374092] [24-1381] (WRP) [Entered: 03/15/2024 04:20 PM] |
APPEARANCE filed by Jamie Goss Dempsey for Appellee USPS w/service 02/26/2024 [5367193] [24-1381] (JGD) [Entered: 02/26/2024 11:11 AM] |
Originating court document filed consisting of notice of appeal, docket entries, Order dated 1/24/2024, Judgment dated 1/24/2024 [5366900] [24-1381] (RDB) [Entered: 02/23/2024 03:50 PM] |
BRIEFING SCHEDULE SET AS FOLLOWS: Appendix due on 04/03/2024. BRIEF OF APPELLANT James M. Johnson due 04/03/2024. Appellee brief is due 30 days from the date the court issues the Notice of Docket Activity filing the brief of appellant. [5366906] [24-1381] (RDB) [Entered: 02/23/2024 03:54 PM] |
Civil case docketed. [5366899] [24-1381] (RDB) [Entered: 02/23/2024 03:47 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Search for this case: James Johnson v. USPS | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: James M. Johnson | |
Represented By: | William R. Pointer |
Represented By: | William Robert Pointer II |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: United States Postal Service | |
Represented By: | Jamie Goss Dempsey |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.