State of Iowa, et al v. SEC
| State of Iowa, State of Arkansas, State of Idaho, State of Missouri, State of Montana, State of Nebraska, State of North Dakota, State of South Dakota, State of Utah and American Free Enterprise Chamber of Commerce |
| United States Securities and Exchange Commission |
| 24-1522 |
| March 12, 2024 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 14, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| APPEARANCE filed by John R. Rady for Respondent SEC w/service 03/14/2024 [5373710] [24-1522] (JRR) [Entered: 03/14/2024 05:02 PM] |
| APPEARANCE filed by Daniel Staroselsky for Respondent SEC w/service 03/14/2024 [5373538] [24-1522] (DS) [Entered: 03/14/2024 01:23 PM] |
| BRIEFING SCHEDULE SET AS FOLLOWS: Administrative Record due 04/22/2024. Appendix due on 05/06/2024. Brief of Petitioners State of Iowa et al due on 05/06/2024. Responsive brief is due 30 days from the date the court issues the Notice of Docket Activity filing the brief.[5372904] [24-1522] (CMH) [Entered: 03/13/2024 10:25 AM] |
| PETITION for Review of an order of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (Electronic) filed by Petitioners American Free Enterprise Chamber of Commerce, State of Arkansas, State of Idaho, State of Iowa, State of Missouri, State of Montana, State of Nebraska, State of North Dakota, State of South Dakota and State of Utah w/service 03/13/2024. [5372897] [24-1522] (CMH) [Entered: 03/13/2024 10:10 AM] |
| Agency case docketed. [5372881] [24-1522] (CMH) [Entered: 03/13/2024 09:55 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
