In Re: Reginald Shumpert
| In re: Reginald L. Shumpert |
| 24-1546 |
| March 15, 2024 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 18, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| MANDATE ISSUED. [5374454] [24-1546] (BNW) [Entered: 03/18/2024 02:54 PM] |
| JUDGMENT FILED - The petition for writ of mandamus filed by Petitioner Reginald L. Shumpert is denied [ # 5373828-2 ]. Mandate shall issue forthwith. DENIED. RAYMOND W. GRUENDER, BOBBY E. SHEPHERD and RALPH R. ERICKSON Adp Mar 2024 [5374440] [24-1546] (BNW) [Entered: 03/18/2024 02:49 PM] |
| CASE SUBMITTED Ad Panel Submission before Judges Raymond W. Gruender, Bobby E. Shepherd, Ralph R. Erickson in St. Louis [5374437] [24-1546] (BNW) [Entered: 03/18/2024 02:46 PM] |
| PETITION for Writ of Mandamus (Rec'd by MAIL) filed by Petitioner Reginald L. Shumpert w/service 02/29/2024 [5373828] [24-1546] (AEV) [Entered: 03/15/2024 10:32 AM] |
| ORIGINAL PROCEEDING case docketed. [5373820] [24-1546] (AEV) [Entered: 03/15/2024 10:21 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: In Re: Reginald Shumpert | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: In re: Reginald L. Shumpert | |
| Represented By: | Reginald L. Shumpert |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
