Timothy Pettus, Jr. v. Q3 Contracting, Inc.
| Timothy Pettus, Jr. |
| Q3 Contracting, Inc., a Minnesota corporation, Charles Smith, also known as Charlie Smith, Charles Smith, also known as Chuck Smith and Primoris Services Corporation, a Texas Corporation |
| 24-1584 |
| March 20, 2024 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit |
| Jobs |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 4, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| CLERK LETTER sent regarding new caption in case. [5380449] [24-1584] (RDB) [Entered: 04/04/2024 01:27 PM] |
| APPEARANCE filed by Christopher E. Hoyme for Appellee Q3 Contracting, Inc. w/service 04/02/2024 [5379763] [24-1584] (CEH) [Entered: 04/02/2024 03:18 PM] |
| APPEARANCE filed by Quinn R. Eaton for Appellee Q3 Contracting, Inc. w/service 04/02/2024 [5379766] [24-1584] (QRE) [Entered: 04/02/2024 03:22 PM] |
| CORPORATE disclosure statement filed by Appellee Q3 Contracting, Inc.. - FOR CAL [5377817] [24-1584] (QRE) [Entered: 03/27/2024 04:51 PM] |
| Civil case docketed. [5375485] [24-1584] (RDB) [Entered: 03/20/2024 04:32 PM] |
| Originating court document filed consisting of notice of appeal, docket entries, Order dated 2/22/2024, Judgment dated 2/26/2024 [5375491] [24-1584] (RDB) [Entered: 03/20/2024 04:41 PM] |
| BRIEFING SCHEDULE SET AS FOLLOWS: Appendix due on 04/29/2024. BRIEF OF APPELLANT Timothy Pettus Jr. due 04/29/2024. Appellee brief is due 30 days from the date the court issues the Notice of Docket Activity filing the brief of appellant. [5375489] [24-1584] (RDB) [Entered: 03/20/2024 04:34 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
