James Waller v. Andrew Bailey
Petitioner: James Clay Waller
Respondent: Andrew Bailey
Case Number: 24-1611
Filed: March 22, 2024
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 22, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
March 22, 2024 MOTION for Permission to file a Successive Habeas Petition (Rec'd by MAIL), filed by Petitioner James Clay Waller w/service 03/22/2024. Response of Andrew Bailey due 04/05/2024. [5376194] [24-1611] (RDB) [Entered: 03/22/2024 02:33 PM]
March 22, 2024 ORIGINAL PROCEEDING case docketed. [5376192] [24-1611] (RDB) [Entered: 03/22/2024 02:30 PM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: James Waller v. Andrew Bailey
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: James Clay Waller
Represented By: James Clay Waller
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Andrew Bailey
Represented By: Habeas Unit Missouri Attorney General
Represented By: Michael Joseph Spillane
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?