National Legal & Policy Center, et al v. SEC
| National Legal and Policy Center and Oil and Gas Workers Association |
| United States Securities and Exchange Commission |
| 24-1685 |
| April 1, 2024 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 1, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Case Docketed On Transfer - United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, Case No. 24-60147. [5379194] [24-1685] (CMH) [Entered: 04/01/2024 12:33 PM] |
| Agency case docketed. [5379197] [24-1685] (CMH) [Entered: 04/01/2024 12:49 PM] |
| PETITION for Review of an order of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (Electronic) filed by Petitioners National Legal and Policy Center and Oil and Gas Workers Association w/service 03/21/2024. (ORIGINALLY FILED IN U.S. COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT on 3/21/2024). [5379199] [24-1685] (CMH) [Entered: 04/01/2024 12:55 PM] |
| DOCUMENT FILED - Unopposed Motion to transfer appeal to United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit with Exhibit A - C filed by National Legal and Policy Center and Oil and Gas Workers Association w/service 03/29/2024. (ORIGINALLY FILED IN U.S. COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT on 3/29/2024). [5379202] [24-1685] (CMH) [Entered: 04/01/2024 01:05 PM] |
| DOCUMENT FILED - U.S. Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation Consolidation Order No. 180 dated 3/21/2024. [5379204] [24-1685] (CMH) [Entered: 04/01/2024 01:12 PM] |
| APPEARANCE filed by Jeffrey Schwab for Petitioners National Legal and Policy Center and Oil and Gas Workers Association w/service 04/01/2024 [5379270] [24-1685] (JMS) [Entered: 04/01/2024 02:22 PM] |
| RESPONSE in opposition to motion [ # 5378581-2 ] filed by Eric H. Wessan for Petitioner State of Iowa, Nicholas J. Bronni for Petitioner State of Arkansas, Joshua N. Turner for Petitioner State of Idaho, Joshua Divine for Petitioner State of Missouri, Christian Brian Corrigan for Petitioner State of Montana, Grant Donald Strobl for Petitioner State of Nebraska, Philip J. Axt for Petitioner State of North Dakota, Charles David McGuigan for Petitioner State of South Dakota, Christopher A. Bates for Petitioner State of Utah and R. Trent McCotter for Petitioner American Free Enterprise Chamber of Commerce in 24-1522, Attorney Luke A. Wake for Petitioners Texas Alliance of Energy Producers and Domestic Energy Producers Alliance in 24-1626, Jorge Benjamin Aguinaga for Petitioner State of Louisiana, Justin L. Matheny for Petitioner State of Mississippi and Wesley S. Williams for Petitioner State of Texas in 24-1627, Attorney Eugene Scalia for Petitioners Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America, Texas Association of Business and Longview Chamber of Commerce in 24-1628, Thomas Elliot Gaiser for Petitioner Ohio Bureau of Workers' Compensation, Matthew F. Kuhn for Petitioner Russell Coleman and James Matthew Rice for Petitioner Jonathan Skrmetti in 24-1631, Stephen John Petrany for Petitioner State of Georgia, Michael Ray Williams for Petitioner State of West Virginia, William Milks for Petitioner State of Alaska, Edmund G. LaCour, Jr. for Petitioner State of Alabama, James A. Barta for Petitioner State of Indiana, Samuel R. V. Garland for Petitioner State of New Hampshire, Garry M. Gaskins, II for Petitioner State of Oklahoma, Thomas T. Hydrick for Petitioner State of South Carolina, Kevin Michael Gallagher for Petitioner Commonwealth of Virginia and Ryan Schelhaas for Petitioner State of Wyoming in 24-1634 , w/service 04/01/2024. [5379427] [24-1522, 24-1623, 24-1624, 24-1626, 24-1627, 24-1628, 24-1631, 24-1633, 24-1634, 24-1685] (ES) [Entered: 04/01/2024 05:29 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.