Leodis Randle v. Eric Higgins, et al
| Leodis Randle |
| Eric Higgins, Does, Agents, Dyer, 12th Street Police Officer, Major, Kenton Buckner, Chief of Police, McFadden, Deputy, Pulaski County Detention, Sanders, Deputy, Pulaski County Detention, York, "New York", Deputy, Pulaski County Detention, Allean, Lieutenant, Pulaski County Detention, Austin, Sergeant, Pulaski County Detention and Stovall, Deputy, Pulaski County Detention |
| 24-1711 |
| April 4, 2024 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit |
| Prison Condition |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 31, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| JUDGMENT FILED - Appellant has failed to respond to the show cause order and the time for a response has expired. This appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution. Mandate shall issue forthwith. [5399589] [24-1711] (NDG) [Entered: 05/31/2024 03:02 PM] |
| MANDATE ISSUED. [5399593] [24-1711] (NDG) [Entered: 05/31/2024 03:04 PM] |
| CLERK ORDER: APPELLANT has failed to pay to the Clerk of the District Court the requisite docketing fees. APPELLANT is directed to show cause within 14 days why this appeal should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute. Response of Leodis Randle due 05/16/2024. [5389894] [24-1711] (CJO) [Entered: 05/02/2024 12:42 PM] |
| Prisoner case docketed. [5380385] [24-1711] (CJO) [Entered: 04/04/2024 11:43 AM] |
| Originating court document filed consisting of notice of appeal, docket entries, Proposed Findings and Recommendations 03/27/2023, Order 10/02/2023, and Order 04/03/2024. [5380391] [24-1711] (CJO) [Entered: 04/04/2024 11:48 AM] |
| CLERK ORDER:The $505 appellate filing and docketing fee has not been paid and is due. Appellant is directed to either pay the fee in the district court or file a motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis in the district court within 21 days of the date of this order. If appellant does not pay the fee or move for IFP status by 04/25/2024, a show cause order will be entered directing the appellant to show cause why this appeal should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute. [5380399] [24-1711] (CJO) [Entered: 04/04/2024 11:54 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
